Abstract:Developing countries, particularly the BRIC countries of Brazil, Russia, India, and China, should accommodate their national systems of innovation to the worldwide intellectual property (IP) regime emerging after the adoption of the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) in a way that maximizes global economic welfare in the foreseeable future. As many developed countries' experience demonstrates, badly configured, over-protectionist IP regimes stifle innovation by making inputs to future innovation too costly and too cumbersome to sustain over time. More carefully considered IP regimes, however, are an important way to protect innovative small- and medium-sized firms from predatory, larger competitors. The challenge is for emerging economies to capture the benefits of IP without importing the serious problems that developed countries have themselves failed to solve. Emerging economies can attain this balance by pursuing a policy of counter-harmonization in which they take advantage of existing exemptions in international agreements governing IP to establish regional, local, and international practices that promote more innovative, flexible uses of IP. Such practices include a research exemption for experimental uses of IP, government imposed nonexclusive licensing, anti-blocking provisions, an essential facilities doctrine, and compulsory licenses. Additional tools include an ex ante regime of compensatory liability rules for small scale innovation and sensible exceptions, particularly for science as well as general fair use provisions, to the exclusive rights of domestic copyright laws. Emerging economies will have to overcome strong economic pressure to accept more restrictive IP regimes as part of free trade agreements as well as a lack of technical expertise and internal government coordination. However, emerging economies have already accrued enough experience to be aware of the strengths and weaknesses of various IP schemes and their own ability to tailor IP to local needs. Developing countries will need to take advantage of that experience and defend innovative practices at international dispute resolution forums. Through creative, determined efforts, the developing countries can avoid other countries' IP excesses while establishing the kind of IP norms that address the real conditions of creativity and innovation in today's digitally empowered universe of scientific discourse.

Our Anti-Intellectual Property Rights System

On the Research of the Construction of the Intellectual Property Protection System for Collaborative Innovation---From the Perspective of Knowledge Spillover

Managing the Provision of Knowledge: The Design of Intellectual Property Laws

On the Impossibility of Intellectual Property

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY IN THE TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY: WILL THE DEVELOPING COUNTRIES LEAD OR FOLLOW?

The Fourth Industrial Revolution, Development and Intellectual Property - the World Economic and Social Survey 2018 and Beyond

Intellectual Property in the Business World: Safeguarding Innovations in Commerce and Management

Innovation Economics Approach to Intellectual Property Law Scholarship

Protection and Promotion of Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) for Economic Competitiveness and Growth

Innovation and Appropriability: Revisiting the Role of Intellectual Property

Making intellectual property rights work for climate technology transfer and innovation in developing countries

Intellectual property rights (IPR): An overview

Intellectual Property and Economic Development: Catalysts for Innovation and Growth

The Limits to Law: How Intellectual Properties Are Used and Protected in Chinese Industries

Restoring the primacy of technological innovation

Intellectual Property Rights and Access in Crisis

Intellectual Property Rights Protection in the Cumulative Innovation:An Auction Model

The effect of intellectual property protection on innovation: Empirical analysis of developing countries panel

Tailoring the Patent System to Work for Software and Technology Patents

Mind the Gap! How the Digital Turn Upsets Intellectual Property

Towards integrating country- and firm-level perspectives on intellectual property rights