Abstract:Developing countries, particularly the BRIC countries of Brazil, Russia, India, and China, should accommodate their national systems of innovation to the worldwide intellectual property (IP) regime emerging after the adoption of the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) in a way that maximizes global economic welfare in the foreseeable future. As many developed countries' experience demonstrates, badly configured, over-protectionist IP regimes stifle innovation by making inputs to future innovation too costly and too cumbersome to sustain over time. More carefully considered IP regimes, however, are an important way to protect innovative small- and medium-sized firms from predatory, larger competitors. The challenge is for emerging economies to capture the benefits of IP without importing the serious problems that developed countries have themselves failed to solve. Emerging economies can attain this balance by pursuing a policy of counter-harmonization in which they take advantage of existing exemptions in international agreements governing IP to establish regional, local, and international practices that promote more innovative, flexible uses of IP. Such practices include a research exemption for experimental uses of IP, government imposed nonexclusive licensing, anti-blocking provisions, an essential facilities doctrine, and compulsory licenses. Additional tools include an ex ante regime of compensatory liability rules for small scale innovation and sensible exceptions, particularly for science as well as general fair use provisions, to the exclusive rights of domestic copyright laws. Emerging economies will have to overcome strong economic pressure to accept more restrictive IP regimes as part of free trade agreements as well as a lack of technical expertise and internal government coordination. However, emerging economies have already accrued enough experience to be aware of the strengths and weaknesses of various IP schemes and their own ability to tailor IP to local needs. Developing countries will need to take advantage of that experience and defend innovative practices at international dispute resolution forums. Through creative, determined efforts, the developing countries can avoid other countries' IP excesses while establishing the kind of IP norms that address the real conditions of creativity and innovation in today's digitally empowered universe of scientific discourse.

The Fourth Industrial Revolution, Development and Intellectual Property - the World Economic and Social Survey 2018 and Beyond

Our Anti-Intellectual Property Rights System

The fourth industrial revolution, changing global value chains and industrial upgrading in emerging economies

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY IN THE TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY: WILL THE DEVELOPING COUNTRIES LEAD OR FOLLOW?

Digital innovation and the fourth industrial revolution: epochal social changes?

The Light and Shadow of the Fourth Industrial Revolution

Torts and intellectual property in Industry 4.0: a comparative study of Chinese and American jurisprudence

Can Artificial Intelligence and the Internet of Things be Governed to Achieve the UN Sustainable Development Goals? An Intellectual Property Law Perspective

Industrial Policy 4.0: Promoting Transformation in the Digital Economy

Making intellectual property rights work for climate technology transfer and innovation in developing countries

The Relationship Between Intellectual Property Rights, Innovation, and Economic Development in the G20 and Selected Developing Countries

The International Protection of Intellectual Property Rights and the Challenges China is Confronted With

Innovation and Appropriability: Revisiting the Role of Intellectual Property

Intellectual Property and Economic Development: Catalysts for Innovation and Growth

Protecting Consumer Protection Values in the Fourth Industrial Revolution

The Fourth Industrial Revolution Adoption: Challenges in South African Higher Education Institutions

The Limits to Law: How Intellectual Properties Are Used and Protected in Chinese Industries

Modern trends and problems of the global intellectual property market development

Innovations and Their Diffusion Versus CSR Practices

The effect of intellectual property protection on innovation: Empirical analysis of developing countries panel

The dynamic development of intellectual property right: Innovation diffusion and evolutionary game—A perspective on patent evolution