Abstract:Open innovation (OI) is high on the commercial and political agenda. It revolves around R&D partnerships, set up to keep up with rapid technological developments. In negotiating such R&D partnerships, the allocation of intellectual property (IP) ownership, in particular patent ownership and trade secret control, is a difficult task. The lack of harmonization of IP law leads to challenges both for collaborating parties and third parties. Many legal patent systems, for instance, impose co-ownership as a default regime for jointly developed technologies. However, under such a regime the exploitation rights may significantly vary and may prescribe the consent of other owners in the case of use, licensing and sale of co-owned patents. These consent requirements may harm the interests of collaborating parties and complicate future exploitation of the technology concerned. To avoid this complexity, parties can establish their own applicable rules. The allocation of trade secret control, on the other hand, is only done on a contractual basis, as legislators do not foresee any default rules on the matter. Typically, the confidential nature of contracts will preclude third parties from obtaining information needed as a basis for initiating an OI process, such as licensing. Neither the default regime, nor the contract-based regime provides the necessary level of transparency and legal certainty to secure the smooth exploitation of jointly developed patents and trade secrets and future engagement in OI for both collaborating parties and third parties. The present paper examines the current IP framework for coupled OI processes in great depth. In addition, this paper reviews recent legislative initiatives to improve legal certainty and transparency, both at the national and EU level, and lists a number of potential legislative measures that could be imposed to further strengthen the legislative framework.

On the Research of the Construction of the Intellectual Property Protection System for Collaborative Innovation---From the Perspective of Knowledge Spillover

On the Construction of SMEs Intellectual Property Protection Ability

The Knowledge Spillover Risks Management Framework for Collaborative Innovation

The Impact of the Tradeoff Between Incentives and Spillovers on Intellectual Property Rights System

Local Innovativeness and Knowledge Spillovers of Indigenous Firms on Foreign Firms: Evidence from China's ICT Industry

Third-party Relational Governance and Collaborative Innovation Performance: the Role of IPR Protection

Intellectual Property Rights Protection in the Cumulative Innovation:An Auction Model

The Limits to Law: How Intellectual Properties Are Used and Protected in Chinese Industries

Discussion on the Information Resources Sharing and Intellectual Property Right in the Knowledge Economy Era

A Theoretical Research on Intellectual Property Right Management System to Promote Indigenous Innovation

Government Supervision,Eel Effect and Intellectual Property Rights Management:Enterprises' Innovation Performance Promotion

The Research on Knowledge Spillover of Industry-University-Research Institute Collaboration Innovation Network

Institutional Regime Shift in Intellectual Property Rights and Innovation Strategies of Firms in China

Innovation Service Platform: Collaboration Based on Contest and Strategy Resources

WIPO initiative of transforming traditional resources and sharing rights: An evolutionary game analysis and a Chinese context

When your friend takes a fall: Spillovers of patent infringement lawsuits on firm innovation via cross-owners

Intellectual Property Ownership in Coupled Open Innovation Processes

The Research on Efficacy Pattern of Knowledge Spillover and Move System in The Process of Cooperative Innovations

The research on the legal protection of High Technology intellectual property

The International Protection of Intellectual Property Rights and the Challenges China is Confronted With

Intellectual property rights protection and sustainable innovation performance: The mediating role of technology spillover