Abstract:Manuscript TypeEmpirical Research Question/IssuePrior studies on the role of state investment tend to focus on either majority state ownership or aggregating majority and minority state ownership. Drawing upon signaling theory, we theorize that the negative intent signaled by minority state ownership reduces initial public offering (IPO) market performance. In addition, we hypothesize that founders as chief executive officers and outside directors not from state-owned enterprises, representing the positive signal of intent, can attenuate the negative effect of minority state ownership. Research Findings/InsightsThe empirical results, based on 274 small and private firms in China's newly launched stock market, provide support for the hypotheses based on price premium, first-day turnover rate, first-day price increase, underpricing, and Tobin's Q. Theoretical/Academic ImplicationsTo the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to examine how minority state ownership affects small and private firm IPO performance. It suggests new avenues of research on ownership structure and the principal-principal problem in the corporate governance of emerging economies. This study reveals the distinctive nature and effect between controlling state ownership and minority state ownership. The current research also opens new avenues of research on applying signaling theory, signal of intent in particular, in an IPO study. Practitioner/Policy ImplicationsThis study reveals the negative intent signaled by minority state ownership in privately controlled firms at IPO due to the weak monitoring capacity, limited resource provision, and enhanced political interdependency between private controllers and minority state owners. As minority state ownership becomes a more salient phenomenon in emerging markets, it guides policy makers in governance choices for government-funded firms.

How Costly is Follow-on Financing After Premature Going-public Decisions?

Do Private Equity Investors Conspire with Ultimate Owners in the IPO Process?

The economics of PIPEs, revisited

Torpedo Your Competition: Strategic Reporting and Peer Firm IPO

A success dressed as a failure? Evidence from post‐IPO withdrawal outcomes in Europe

Corporate fraud and industry peer effects on IPO underpricing

Initial Public Offering, Corporate Innovation and Total Factor Productivity: Evidence from China

Do IPO Firms Become Myopic?

Family Firm Governance and Financial Policy Choices in Newly Public Firms

On the Anticipation of Ipo Underpricing: Evidence from Equity Carve-Outs

How Can New Ventures Command a Price Premium with Innovations in Emerging Markets?

Entrepreneurial Finance Meets Government Investment at Initial Public Offering: the Role of Minority State Ownership

Earnings Management and the Long-Run Market Performance of Initial Public Offerings

CEO Exit after IPO: Which Wealth Matters?

"Ownership Transition, Managerial Short-Termism, and Exploratory Vs Exploitative Innovation Strategy"

Disclosure of Intended Use of Proceeds and Underpricing in Initial Public Offerings

Working capital management of IPO firms

Do Private Equity Sponsors Sacrifice Long-Term Value for Short-Term Profit? Evidence from a Comprehensive Sample of Large Buyouts and Exit Outcomes

IPO underpricing and overpricing and long-term firm performance in the Netherlands, United Kingdom, France, Sweden, and Italy: learning from three Dutch IPOs

The sunk cost fallacy in venture capital staging: Decision-making dynamics for follow-on investment rounds

Ambiguous Signals and Information Asymmetry in the Initial Public Offering Process: Examining Ownership Concentration, Process Time, and Underpricing