Abstract:Venture capital(VC) has been playing an increasingly important role in the growth of early-stage companies around the globe.In addition to providing equity financing,venture capital-ists also involve heavily in the management of investee companies and provide a number of value-added services.However,Gompers(1996) notes that VCs have strong incentives to grandstand by tak-ing investee firms public prematurely in order to exit and realize investment returns early.Hence,the net impact of VC involvement on firm performance remains unclear.Using a sample of companies listed on the Shenzhen small and medium-sized enterprises(SMEs) board between 2004 and 2008,this paper examines the impact of VC on the short-term and long-term firm performance in emerging markets,particularly China.Empirical results show that compared with non-VC backed firms,VC backed firms are generally younger and smaller at the time of their initial public offering(IPO),as well as exhibit greater IPO underpricing.Moreover,although VC-and non-VC backed firms do not exhibit differential performance dur-ing the lockup period,the former experience significantly greater decline in accounting performance as well as poorer stock return after the expiration of the lockup period.Additional analyses show that the level of underpricing and decline in firm performance are negatively associated with the age of VC firms.These results pro-vide empirical evidence in accordance with Gompers(1996) grand-standing hypothesis,suggesting that VC firms in China have strong incentives to take firms public prematurely in order to exit and real-ize investment returns early.This strategic behavior in turn has a negative impact on the long-term performance and well-being of in-vestee companies.We further partition the subsample of VC-backed firms into those backed by state-owned VC firms and those backed by non-state-owned VC firms.Empirical evidence shows that com-panies invested by non-state-owned VC firms tend to underperform those backed by state-owned VC firms,suggesting that state-owned VC firms have less incentive to grandstand.

The influence of initial sponsor backing on post‐IPO acquisition activity

Do Private Equity Investors Conspire with Ultimate Owners in the IPO Process?

Do Private Equity Sponsors Sacrifice Long-Term Value for Short-Term Profit? Evidence from a Comprehensive Sample of Large Buyouts and Exit Outcomes

A Study of Private Equity Rounds of Entrepreneurial Finance in EU: Are Buyout Funds Uninvited Guests for Startup Ecosystems?

Do Private Equity Returns Result from Wealth Transfers and Short-Termism? Evidence from a Comprehensive Sample of Large Buyouts

Spillovers of PE investments

Insider Stock Pledges and Shareholder Wealth

Does Venture Capital Backing Improve Disclosure Controls and Procedures? Evidence from Management's Post-IPO Disclosures

Going public to acquire? The acquisition motive in IPOs

How Costly is Follow-on Financing After Premature Going-public Decisions?

VCs' Backgrounds,IPO Underpricing and Post-IPO Performance

Excess IPO Funds As an Imprint: an Imprinting Perspective of Acquisition Activity

The Effect of Venture Capital on the Performance of IPO Companies

Shadow Capital in Venture Financing: Selection, Valuation, and Exit Dynamic

Plundered or profitably pumped-up? The effects of private equity takeover

Growth LBOs

VC ownership post‐IPO: When, why, and how do VCs exit?

Proximity relations and the fate of VC-backed startups: Evidence from a global 33-year-long dataset

Impacts of Peers’ Mergers and Acquisitions on Firm Innovation

Flipping the Coin: Are Spacs Post-Merger Value-Creating or Value-Destroying? An Empirical Study on the Value Effects of Special Purpose Acquisition Companies in the United States

The Effect of Venture Capitalist Participation on long-term performance——Evidence from SME board listed companies