Abstract:Aim: This research contributes to the study of the relationship between initial public offering (IPO) under- and overpricing and long-term firm performance as measured by net income. Research methods: Using ordinary least-squares regressions, an international sample of 444 IPOs from the United Kingdom, Sweden, France, Italy, and the Netherlands for the period 2013–2017 is analysed. The data was extracted from the Eikon Refinitiv database. Further, an in-depth analysis of three Dutch IPOs by six interviews with five (former) management members and one investment banker is conducted. Conclusions: The results show that the more profitable a firm is in the long run, the likelier positive initial stock returns move towards zero after the first trading day. The case studies support these findings and the concept of asymmetric information between market participants can offer a partial explanation. Additionally, as firms operating in the industrial and healthcare sector grow larger, the offer price tends to be closer to the overall market demand. Nonetheless, no significant relationship is found between initial stock return and net profitability for other industries. While the country analysis also displays no significant relationship, underpricing is more prevalent in the United Kingdom than in the other sample countries. Originality: This article combines a full-fledged quantitative study with a full-fledged qualitative study on one of the most perilous corporate finance milestones, that is, the complex transformation from a private to a public company through a stock market listing. Limitations: The sample composition skews towards underpriced IPOs. Also, although the notion of reverse causality is discussed based on the views of interviewees, no quantitative evidence is provided.

A success dressed as a failure? Evidence from post‐IPO withdrawal outcomes in Europe

The impact of prestigious attorneys on IPO withdrawal in the global primary market

Does voluntary environmental, social, and governance disclosure impact initial public offer withdrawal risk?

How Costly is Follow-on Financing After Premature Going-public Decisions?

IPO underpricing and overpricing and long-term firm performance in the Netherlands, United Kingdom, France, Sweden, and Italy: learning from three Dutch IPOs

The Competing-Risk Analysis of Post-IPO De-Listings

CEO Exit after IPO: Which Wealth Matters?

Inflation and stock market growth: the case of IPO withdrawal

IPO Suspensions and Venture Capital Activity

Initial Public Offering, Corporate Innovation and Total Factor Productivity: Evidence from China

The Exposure Rate Of Existing Shareholders, Underpricing And IPO Withdrawals At Borsa Istanbul: A Special Look At Opportunity Cost Of Issuance

Export Activity, IPO Underpricing, Long-Run Performance and Survival

Are Initial Public Offerings Significant to Firm Performance in an Emerging Stock Market? Evidence from China

Earnings Management and Delisting Risk of Initial Public Offerings

Do Export Activities Matter for the Performance and Survival of IPO Firms?

Competitive Effects of IPOs: Evidence from Chinese Listing Suspensions

The impact of changing disclosure requirements, competition, and private capital on firm exit methods and premiums

Earnings Management and the Long-Run Market Performance of Initial Public Offerings

Do IPO Firms Become Myopic?

Torpedo Your Competition: Strategic Reporting and Peer Firm IPO

What a Relief: How do Firms Respond to Competitors’ Listing Delays?