Abstract:Purpose This paper aims to study the underpricing phenomenon of initial public offerings (IPOs) of 355 Indian companies issued from 2007 to 2019. The research question this paper empirically examines is whether Indian corporate executives deliberately underprice IPOs from its fair value to attract investors, thereby causing an abnormal spike in the prices on the listing day. The findings of this study challenge a commonly held notion of leaving money on the table by IPO issuing companies. Of the overall average listing day returns of 17%, the deliberate premarket underpricing component is found to be mere 5.3%, while the remaining price fluctuation is, inter alia, a result of market momentum along with the unmet demands of impatient investors. Design/methodology/approach Following Koop and Li (2001), this study uses Stochastic frontier model (SFM) to study a routine anomaly of disparity between the primary market price (i.e. IPO issue price) and the secondary market price (listing price). The jump in the issue price observed on a listing day is decomposed into deliberate premarket underpricing component that reflects the extent of managerial manipulation and the after-market misvaluation component attributable to information asymmetry and prevailing market volatility. Findings This paper uses SFM to bifurcate initial returns into deliberate underpricing by managers and after-market mispricing by noise traders. This study finds that a significant part of the initial return is explained through after-market mispricing. This study finds that average initial returns are 17%, deliberate premarket underpricing is 5.3% and after-market mispricing averages 11.9%. Research limitations/implications This study can isolate underpricing done at the premarket by estimating a systematic one-sided error term that measures the maximum predicted issue price deviation from the offered price. Consequentially, the disaggregation of initial returns may be especially informative for retail investors in planning their exit strategy from an IPO by separating the strength of the firm's fundamentals and its causal relationship with the initial returns. Substantial proportion of after-market mispricing implies that future research should focus on factors causing after-market mispricing. As underlying causes are identified, tailor-made policy responses can be formulated to benefit investors. Practical implications This paper has empirically validated that initial return is a mix of both components, i.e. deliberate underpricing and aftermarket mispricing. This disaggregation of initial returns can prove helpful for investors in planning their exit strategy. This study can help investors to become more aware of the importance of the fundamentals of the firm and its causal relation with the initial returns. This information in turn can help reduce the information asymmetry amongst investors and help them lessen the costs of adverse selection. Originality/value A large number of research studies on IPO pricing find overwhelming evidence of underpricing in public issues. This research attempts to decompose the extent of underpricing into deliberate underpricing and after-market mispricing, thereby supplementing the existing literature on the IPO pricing puzzle. To the best of the authors' knowledge, this study is the first contribution to the literature on initial return decomposition for the Indian capital markets.

The Exposure Rate Of Existing Shareholders, Underpricing And IPO Withdrawals At Borsa Istanbul: A Special Look At Opportunity Cost Of Issuance

Inflation and stock market growth: the case of IPO withdrawal

Pricing of IPOs under legally-mandated concentrated ownership and commitment period: Evidence from a natural experiment for REITs in Turkey

A success dressed as a failure? Evidence from post‐IPO withdrawal outcomes in Europe

Does voluntary environmental, social, and governance disclosure impact initial public offer withdrawal risk?

A COMPARATIVE MCDA ANALYSIS ON THE LONG-TERM PERFORMANCE OF IPOs DURING THE PANDEMIC ON BORSA ISTANBUL

IPO underpricing and overpricing and long-term firm performance in the Netherlands, United Kingdom, France, Sweden, and Italy: learning from three Dutch IPOs

The impact of prestigious attorneys on IPO withdrawal in the global primary market

IPO Anomalies: Impact on the Efficiency of Initial Public Offerings

What Determines the Success of an IPO? Analysis of IPO Underpricing on the Warsaw Stock Exchange

Impact of pricing mechanism on IPO oversubscription: evidence from Pakistan stock exchange

IPO Intra Industry Effects on Peer Firm's Earnings, Composition and Stock Returns

The Importance of Initial Public Offering for Capital Market Development in Developing Countries

ESG Disclosure and Idiosyncratic Risk in Initial Public Offerings

Torpedo Your Competition: Strategic Reporting and Peer Firm IPO

Ambiguous Signals and Information Asymmetry in the Initial Public Offering Process: Examining Ownership Concentration, Process Time, and Underpricing

Deliberate underpricing and after-market mispricing in Indian IPO market: Stochastic frontier approach

The underpricing and long-term performance of Chinese IPOs listed on the Hong Kong exchange

The Impact of Corporate Governance Capacity on Share Price

Effects of IPO Offer Price Ranges on Initial Subscription, Initial Turnover and Ownership Structure—Evidence from Indian IPO Market

Factors Influencing IPO Underpricing in Poland