Abstract:This paper compares two estimators—the Border Approach and an Instrumental Variable (IV) estimator—using a unified framework where identifying variation arises from “preference externalities,” following the intuition in Waldfogel (2003) . We highlight two dimensions in favor of the IV approach. First, an econometric model of the data-generating process reveals that the border approach requires a set of identification assumptions that are not easily satisfied in practice: the ignorance of some payoff-relevant information and conflicting spatial correlation assumptions. The IV approach, in contrast, exhibits greater internal validity because it is derived from the model that generates the data. Second, the border approach suffers from representative issues when the true effect sizes are different between border and off-border regions. We use a common political advertising example to evaluate these estimators and suggest ways to evaluate or limit the above concerns, such as excluding localities that are a large share of the policy making region and evaluating spatial correlations of observables. We find the border approach’s representative issue to be substantial when the ignorance assumption is most plausible and observe that spatial correlations do not reflect those needed in the unobservables for consistency of the estimator. The IV, in contrast, does not exhibit concerns related to local average treatment effects. We also derive the specific conditions when the border approach can reduce bias relative to OLS. This paper was accepted by Raphael Thomadsen, marketing. Funding: This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [72072004, 72131001]. Supplemental Material: The data files are available at https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2023.4977 .

Difference-in-Differences Hedonics

Spatial Heterogeneity in Implicit Housing Prices: Evidence from Hangzhou, China

Are Difference-in-Differences Estimates Blowing Smoke? A Cautionary Tale From an Oft-Used Natural Experiment

Hedonic Price Analysis of Urban Housing: an Empirical Research on Hangzhou, China

Comparative Analysis of Visual Amenity Services Valuation: A Nationwide Assessment Through Propensity Scoring Matching and Hedonic Regression

Preference Externality Estimators: A Comparison of Border Approaches and IVs

An Optimal Transport Approach to Estimating Causal Effects via Nonlinear Difference-in-Differences

Fuzzy Differences-in-Differences

Causal Duration Analysis with Diff-in-Diff

Revisiting Event-Study Designs: Robust and Efficient Estimation

Difference-in-Differences Estimators of Intertemporal Treatment Effects

A comparison of regret-based and utility-based discrete choice modelling – an empirical illustration with hospital bed choice

The chained difference-in-differences

Difference-in-Differences for Policy Evaluation

Changes-in-Changes for Ordered Choice Models: Too Many "False Zeros"?

How Much Should We Trust Staggered Difference-In-Differences Estimates?

Nonparametric Approaches to Empirical Welfare Analysis

A Semiparametric Instrumented Difference-in-Differences Approach to Policy Learning

Do We Exploit all Information for Counterfactual Analysis? Benefits of Factor Models and Idiosyncratic Correction

Two-Way Fixed Effects and Differences-in-Differences with Heterogeneous Treatment Effects: A Survey

Hedonic Consumption: Emerging Concepts, Methods and Propositions