Abstract:Objective: Despite the high success rate, implant-supported prostheses fail in some cases. Control of the applied forces is an important factor determining the success or failure of implants. Comprehensive understanding of the biomechanical principles in implant-supported prostheses is necessary for offering an appropriate custom-made treatment plan for each patient and reducing the risk of functional complications. Finite element analysis is a quantitative method for the assessment of force distribution in complex structures. This study sought to compare the effect of different framework materials on stress distribution in bone supporting implants using three-dimensional finite element analysis. Methods: In this in-vitro study, a three-dimensional model of bone was obtained using Cone Beam Computerized Tomography (CBCT). Using CATIA V5R20 (Dassault Systems, France) software, a Nobel Replace tapered implant (Nobel pharma Co., Gothenburg, Sweden) measuring 13 mm in height and 4.3 mm in diameter was virtually inserted in the anterior maxilla. A titanium abutment, ZOE cement and superstructure with different frameworks (Ag-Pd, Ni-Cr, and fiber-reinforced composite) were designed. Force was applied in an amount of 178 N at three angulations of zero, 30 and 45° relative to the implant axis and the maximum von-Mises stress and maximum strain were calculated for cortical and trabecular bones. Results: Changing the framework material caused a small change in level of stress and strain and their distribution pattern. By increasing the angulation of the applied force, amount of stress and strain in the implant-supporting bone increased. Maximum stress and strain were applied at 45° angulation. At zero degree angulation, maximum stress in the cortical bone was 17.326 MPa with Ni-Cr framework, 17.383 MPa with Ag-Pd and 17.321 MPa with fiber-reinforced composite. In loading at 30° angulation, maximum stress in the cortical bone was 136.95 MPa with Ni-Cr framework, 136.03 MPa with Ag-Pd framework and 136.18 MPa with fiber-reinforced composite framework. In loading at 45° angulation, maximum stress in the cortical bone was 161.37 MPa with Ni-Cr, 161.21 MPA with Ag-Pd and 160.4 MPa with fiber-reinforced frameworks. Conclusion: Different framework materials had no significant effect on the amount or distribution of stress in bone around implant.

The influence of framework material on stress distribution in maxillary complete-arch fixed prostheses supported by four dental implants: a three-dimensional finite element analysis

Finite element analysis of the effect of framework materials at the bone–implant interface in the all-on-four implant system

Finite element analysis of the effect of framework materials at the bone-implant interface in the all-on-four implant system

Biomechanical investigation of maxillary implant-supported full-arch prostheses produced with different framework materials: a finite elements study

Comparative Evaluation of Stress Distribution of Zirconia, Cobalt Chromium and Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) Framework Material on an Atrophic Maxilla in All-on-6 Implant Treatment Concepts – A 3 Dimensional Finite Element Analysis

Comparative evaluation of stress distribution of zirconia, cobalt chromium, and polyetheretherketone (PEEK) framework material on an atrophic maxilla in all-on-six implant treatment concepts: A three-dimensional finite element analysis

Mechanical response of different frameworks for maxillary all-on-four implant-supported fixed dental prosthesis: 3D finite element analysis

[Analysis of polyetheretherketone framework on the stress distribution of implant-supported fixed maxillary prosthesis: 3-D finite element analysis]

Influence of Framework Material and Posterior Implant Angulation in Full-Arch All-on-4 Implant-Supported Prosthesis Stress Concentration

Effects of Prosthetic Material and Framework Design on Stress Distribution in Dental Implants and Peripheral Bone: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis

[Three-dimensional finite element analysis of different framework materials in implant-supported fixed mandibular prosthesis]

Effect of Framework Material on Stress Distribution around Implants using Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis

Influences of Implant and Framework Materials on Stress Distribution: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis Study.

The Effect of Framework Design on Stress Distribution in Implant-Supported FPDs: A 3-D FEM Study

Implant-Supported Fixed Partial Prostheses With Different Prosthetic Materials: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Stress Analysis

Evaluation of Stresses on Implant, Bone, and Restorative Materials Caused by Different Opposing Arch Materials in Hybrid Prosthetic Restorations Using the All-on-4 Technique

Biomechanical Analysis of Different Framework Design, Framework Material and Bone Density in the Edentulous Mandible with Fixed Implant-Supported Prostheses: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Study.

Finite element analysis of the effect of framework material and thickness on the biomechanical performance of 'All‐on‐Four' full-arch prosthesis

Effect of framework material and vertical misfit on stress distribution in implant-supported partial prosthesis under load application: 3-D finite element analysis

Effect of Different Framework Materials in Implant-Supported Fixed Mandibular Prostheses: A Finite Element Analysis

Influence of Framework Material and Abutment Configuration on Fatigue Performance in Dental Implant Systems: A Finite Element Analysis