Abstract:Background: Many clinical studies have reported the high success rate of the All-on-4 concept. In the present study, we aimed to compare the stress distribution with different tilted distal implants and cantilever lengths in an All-on-4 system using the two-dimensional photoelastic method and to establish the All-on-4 implant photoelastic model by computer-aided design (CAD) and rapid prototyping (RP). METHODS: The data of the human edentulous mandible were acquired by computed tomography (CT). Three human edentulous mandible All-on-4 implant models with different distally inclined implant holes were fabricated using Mimic, Geomagic Studio software, and a light solidifying fast shaping machine. Then the final photoelastic models were established through the traditional method. Each of the three models had four NobelSpeedy Replace implants between the interforaminal regions. The two posterior implants were placed 0, 15, and 45 degrees distally before the mental foramen. The four implants were splinted by wrought cobalt-chromium alloy frameworks. Each of the three photoelastic models was submitted to a 150 N vertical load at five points on the framework: the central fossa of the mandibular first molar, and 0 mm, 5 mm, 10 mm, and 15 mm of the cantilever length. The stress produced in the models was photographed with a digital camera, and the highest value of the stressed fringe pattern was recorded. Results: The All-on-4 implant photoelastic model established by CAD and RP was highly controllable and easy to modify. The position and inclination of implants were accurate, and the frameworks could be passively emplaced. The stress values were higher around a single tilted implant compared with the distal implant in All-on-4 with the same inclination. The 0-degree distal implant and 45-degree distal implant demonstrated the highest and lowest stress when loading at the central fossa of the mandibular first molar, respectively. With the same inclination of distal implant, the peri-implant bone stress increased as the length of cantilever increased. Conclusion: The method of establishing the All-on-4 implant photoelastic model by CAD and RP was highly controllable, convenient, fast, and accurate. The tilted implants splinted in the fully fixed prosthesis with reduced cantilever lengths did not increase the stress level compared with the vertical distal implants.And this illustrated that the influence of cantilever on stress distribution was greater than the influence of implant inlination.

Comparison between all-on-four and all-on-six treatment concepts and framework material on stress distribution in atrophic maxilla: A prototyping guided 3D-FEA study

Clinical and Patient-Centered Outcomes Following Rehabilitation of Atrophic Edentulous Maxilla Using Six Implants Placed Simultaneously with Bilateral Maxillary Sinus Augmentation: A Retrospective Case Series.

Influence of Framework Material and Posterior Implant Angulation in Full-Arch All-on-4 Implant-Supported Prosthesis Stress Concentration

Comparative evaluation of stress distribution of zirconia, cobalt chromium, and polyetheretherketone (PEEK) framework material on an atrophic maxilla in all-on-six implant treatment concepts: A three-dimensional finite element analysis

Finite element analysis of the effect of framework materials at the bone-implant interface in the all-on-four implant system

Comparative Evaluation of Stress Distribution of Zirconia, Cobalt Chromium and Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) Framework Material on an Atrophic Maxilla in All-on-6 Implant Treatment Concepts – A 3 Dimensional Finite Element Analysis

The influence of framework material on stress distribution in maxillary complete-arch fixed prostheses supported by four dental implants: a three-dimensional finite element analysis

Biomechanical comparison of different prosthetic materials and posterior implant angles in all-on-4 treatment concept by three-dimensional finite element analysis

Finite element analysis of the effect of framework materials at the bone–implant interface in the all-on-four implant system

Evaluation of Stresses on Implant, Bone, and Restorative Materials Caused by Different Opposing Arch Materials in Hybrid Prosthetic Restorations Using the All-on-4 Technique

Comparative three-dimensional finite element analysis of implant-supported fixed complete arch mandibular prostheses in two materials

Biomechanical investigation of maxillary implant-supported full-arch prostheses produced with different framework materials: a finite elements study

Effect of Different Framework Materials in Implant-Supported Fixed Mandibular Prostheses: A Finite Element Analysis

Stress distribution pattern in all-on-four maxillary restorations supported by porous tantalum and solid titanium implants using three-dimensional finite element analysis

Mechanical response of different frameworks for maxillary all-on-four implant-supported fixed dental prosthesis: 3D finite element analysis

Influence of the frameworks of implant-supported prostheses and implant connections on stress distribution

A Biomechanical Evaluation of Distal Tilting Implants in All-on-Four Rehabilitation with Mild Mandibular Resorption: A Finite Element Analysis Study

Effect of framework material and vertical misfit on stress distribution in implant-supported partial prosthesis under load application: 3-D finite element analysis

Three-dimensional finite element analysis of two angled narrow-diameter implant designs for an all-on-4 prosthesis

Biomechanical analysis of stress around the tilted implants with different cantilever lengths in all-on-4 concept

Effect of Framework Material on Stress Distribution around Implants using Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis