Abstract:Objective: Despite the high success rate, implant-supported prostheses fail in some cases. Control of the applied forces is an important factor determining the success or failure of implants. Comprehensive understanding of the biomechanical principles in implant-supported prostheses is necessary for offering an appropriate custom-made treatment plan for each patient and reducing the risk of functional complications. Finite element analysis is a quantitative method for the assessment of force distribution in complex structures. This study sought to compare the effect of different framework materials on stress distribution in bone supporting implants using three-dimensional finite element analysis. Methods: In this in-vitro study, a three-dimensional model of bone was obtained using Cone Beam Computerized Tomography (CBCT). Using CATIA V5R20 (Dassault Systems, France) software, a Nobel Replace tapered implant (Nobel pharma Co., Gothenburg, Sweden) measuring 13 mm in height and 4.3 mm in diameter was virtually inserted in the anterior maxilla. A titanium abutment, ZOE cement and superstructure with different frameworks (Ag-Pd, Ni-Cr, and fiber-reinforced composite) were designed. Force was applied in an amount of 178 N at three angulations of zero, 30 and 45° relative to the implant axis and the maximum von-Mises stress and maximum strain were calculated for cortical and trabecular bones. Results: Changing the framework material caused a small change in level of stress and strain and their distribution pattern. By increasing the angulation of the applied force, amount of stress and strain in the implant-supporting bone increased. Maximum stress and strain were applied at 45° angulation. At zero degree angulation, maximum stress in the cortical bone was 17.326 MPa with Ni-Cr framework, 17.383 MPa with Ag-Pd and 17.321 MPa with fiber-reinforced composite. In loading at 30° angulation, maximum stress in the cortical bone was 136.95 MPa with Ni-Cr framework, 136.03 MPa with Ag-Pd framework and 136.18 MPa with fiber-reinforced composite framework. In loading at 45° angulation, maximum stress in the cortical bone was 161.37 MPa with Ni-Cr, 161.21 MPA with Ag-Pd and 160.4 MPa with fiber-reinforced frameworks. Conclusion: Different framework materials had no significant effect on the amount or distribution of stress in bone around implant.

Implant-Supported Fixed Partial Prostheses With Different Prosthetic Materials: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Stress Analysis

Effects of Prosthetic Material and Framework Design on Stress Distribution in Dental Implants and Peripheral Bone: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis

Stress analysis of different prosthesis materials in implant-supported fixed dental prosthesis using 3D finite element method

Biomechanical investigation of maxillary implant-supported full-arch prostheses produced with different framework materials: a finite elements study

Influence of prosthesis type and material on the stress distribution in bone around implants: A 3-dimensional finite element analysis

[Three-dimensional finite element analysis of different framework materials in implant-supported fixed mandibular prosthesis]

Effect of Framework Material on Stress Distribution around Implants using Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis

A pilot study to evaluate the influence of implant supported prosthesis framework material on the stress distribution in peri-implant bone in anterior mandible: A three dimensional finite element analysis

Influences of Implant and Framework Materials on Stress Distribution: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis Study.

Effect of Different Framework Materials in Implant-Supported Fixed Mandibular Prostheses: A Finite Element Analysis

Comparative three-dimensional finite element analysis of implant-supported fixed complete arch mandibular prostheses in two materials

Influence of prosthetic index structures and implant materials on stress distribution in implant restorations: a three-dimensional finite element analysis

The influence of framework material on stress distribution in maxillary complete-arch fixed prostheses supported by four dental implants: a three-dimensional finite element analysis

Evaluation of stress distribution in bone and three-unit fixed implant-supported prostheses with zirconia and titanium abutments: A 3D finite element analysis

[Analysis of polyetheretherketone framework on the stress distribution of implant-supported fixed maxillary prosthesis: 3-D finite element analysis]

Effect of different occlusal materials on peri-implant stress distribution with different osseointegration condition: A finite element analysis

Effect of framework material and vertical misfit on stress distribution in implant-supported partial prosthesis under load application: 3-D finite element analysis

Assessment of stress shielding around a dental implant for variation of implant stiffness and parafunctional loading using finite element analysis

A 3D Finite Element Analysis Model of Single Implant-Supported Prosthesis under Dynamic Impact Loading for Evaluation of Stress in the Crown, Abutment and Cortical Bone Using Different Rehabilitation Materials

Evaluation of Stresses on Implant, Bone, and Restorative Materials Caused by Different Opposing Arch Materials in Hybrid Prosthetic Restorations Using the All-on-4 Technique

[Stress in an implant-supported unitary fixed partial prosthesis with different materials in the first lower premolar through finite elements]