Abstract:Purpose This study investigates whether consideration of future consequences (CFC), Machiavellianism (MACH) and the perceived role of ethics and social responsibility (PRESOR) enhance understanding of the impact of tax audit risk on compliance. Design/methodology/approach A between-subjects experiment is conducted to test the hypotheses. A hypothetical tax audit case (or lack thereof) is used to create a high (low) perceived tax audit risk. The usable responses of 144 participants representing the general taxpayer population are analyzed. Findings The results suggest that taxpayers with lower CFC, MACH or PRESOR scores are more compliant when tax audit risk is high than low. In contrast, taxpayers with higher CFC, MACH or PRESOR scores are indifferent toward high or low tax audit risk. Research limitations/implications Research can elicit consideration of future consequences of being detected for taxpayers with lower CFC scores to increase compliance. Additionally, increased saliency of tax audit risk and detection of noncompliance in a tax audit can enhance the compliance of taxpayers with lower MACH scores. Dissemination of information via social media on the value of ethical and social responsibility of compliance can also increase the compliance of taxpayers with higher PRESOR scores. Practical implications This study helps researchers and the tax authority better understand the complexities of compliance and the ethical dilemmas that taxpayers face, especially when a considerable amount of cash income is involved. To deter underreporting of cash income, the tax authority can use social media to explain how data analytics tools can facilitate the analysis and integration of multiple sources of a taxpayer’s income and expenses. Originality/value Prior studies present participants with objective tax audit rates, such as 5, 25 and 30 (Cullis et al. , 2006; Maciejovsky et al. , 2007; Trivedi et al. , 2003) or 50% (Maciejovsky et al. , 2012) to investigate tax compliance. However, the actual tax audit rate is very low (about 1%) due to the limited resources of the tax authority (Alm and Torgler, 2011). To attenuate perceptions of unrealistic tax audit rates, this study operationalizes high (low) tax audit risk via a hypothetical tax audit case (or lack thereof) to examine the impact of tax audit risk on compliance.

The Association between Auditor Provided Tax Planning and Tax Compliance Services and Tax Avoidance and Tax Risk

External Auditor Responses to Tax Risk

Tax Avoidance: Does Tax-Specific Industry Expertise Make a Difference?

Perceived tax audit aggressiveness, tax control frameworks and tax planning: an empirical analysis

PCAOB Inspections, Knowledge Diffusion, and Corporate Tax Planning Effectiveness

Do Signatory Auditors with Tax Expertise Facilitate or Curb Tax Aggressiveness?

Does expanded disclosure in the audit report involve unintended consequences? Evidence from tax avoidance

Navigating the Nexus of Tax Avoidance and Strategic Planning: Insights and Strategies

The Association between Audit Quality and Corporate Tax Avoidance. A Bibliometric Review of Literature and Early Evidence on the European Union, from the Perspective of Tax-Related Key Audit Matters Disclosure

Implications of tax audit risk, consequences, aggressive behavior and ethics for compliance

Tax Avoidance, Property Rights and Audit Fees

Strategic Effect of Tax Avoidance: The Causal Impact of Tax Avoidance on Firms'Product Market Performance

Analysis Of The Effect Of Good Corporate Governance, Company Profitability And Risk On Tax Avoidance

Internal Control Quality: The Role of Auditor-Provided Tax Services

A Theory of the Tax Avoidance (Tax Planning) Continuum

Tax Aggressiveness and Corporate Transparency

The role of accountancy firms in tax avoidance: Some evidence and issues

Law Firms as Tax Planning Service Providers

Tax Avoidance and the Implications of Weak Internal Controls

Board Risk Oversight and Corporate Tax-Planning Practices

The Three Hurdles of Tax Planning: How Business Context, Aims of Tax Planning, and Tax Manager Power Affect Tax Expense