Abstract:Recently, studies on rhetorical structure of research articles (RAs) have attracted a great attention of researchers. Among the sections of RA, the Introduction section has been investigated extensively while much fewer studies have been done on the Methods section. Besides, the majority of the existing studies focus only on a single discipline or on a comparison between two disciplines. Very little, however, has been conducted to compare the rhetorical structure between two sub-disciplines from one academic field. In this study, therefore, the Methods sections from Management and Marketing, two sub-disciplines of business, were analyzed and compared to identify the rhetorical variations due to disciplinary concepts and practices between these two sub-disciplines. Two sets of corpus were compiled, each with ten Methods sections from two prestigious journals in the fields of Management and Marketing, respectively. Lim’s model (2006) for the rhetorical structure of the Methods section in Management was adopted as the analytical framework. Results of the analysis showed that the chosen analytical framework could not offer sufficient explanations for the rhetorical structure of the Methods sections in the two sub-disciplines of business, even revealing some discrepancies between the framework and the actual texts. Only 30% of the Methods sections in the Management corpus appeared to fit the selected model while in the Marketing corpus, the Methods sections had a greater diversity of rhetorical patterns due to the requirements for publishing in the two selected Marketing journals. The findings in this study may have some implications for writing the Methods sections in the business discipline, such as the need for explicit instruction of writing conventions of this particular section and the guidance to realize the rhetorical differences between these two sub-disciplines for more effective sub-discipline specific writing. Keywords: The Methods Section, Research Article, Management, Marketing, Disciplinary Variations

Information structures in sociology research papers: Modeling cause–effect and comparison relations in research objective and result statements 1

Analyzing Critical Thinking Elements in the Argument Structure of Non-English-Major Chinese Undergraduate Students' Writing

The Representation of Argumentation in Scientific Papers: A Comparative Analysis of Two Research Areas

The contribution of cause-effect link to representing the core of scientific paper—The role of Semantic Link Network

Research Articles in Applied Linguistics: Structures from a Functional Perspective

Structural Patterns in Empirical Research Articles: A Cross-Disciplinary Study

A Model for the Identification of the Functional Structures of Unstructured Abstracts in the Social Sciences.

Association Relationship Analyses Of Stylistic Syntactic Structures

A Group Argumentation Information-Structuring Model in Hall for Workshop of Metasynthetic Engineering

Argument Structure Mining in Scientific Articles: A Comparative Analysis

Interpretative structural modeling to social sciences: designing better datasets for mixed method research

The rhetorical structure of science? A multidisciplinary analysis of article headings

THE METHODS SECTIONS IN MANAGEMENT AND MARKETING RESEARCH ARTICLES: RHETORICAL VARIATIONS BETWEEN TWO SUB-DISCIPLINES OF BUSINESS

Prespecification of Structure for Optimizing Data Collection and Research Transparency by Leveraging Conditional Independencies

Structure vs. Language: Investigating the Multi-factors of Asymmetric Opinions on Online Social Interrelationship with a Case Study

Rhetorical relations for information retrieval

Rhetorical structure of research paper introductions in computer science: a comparative analysis

On the Information Structure,Subtopic and Analytic Problems of Chinese Objects

Model Construction and Empirical Research on Information Searching Behavior of Researchers from the Perspective of Situational Cognition

The Structure and Dynamics of Co-Citation Clusters: A Multiple-Perspective Co-Citation Analysis

Variability in the rhetorical structure of research article introductions: The case of civil engineering