Abstract:Constructing scientific arguments is an important practice for students because it helps them to make sense of data using scientific knowledge and within the conceptual and experimental boundaries of an investigation. In this study, we used a text mining method called Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) to identify underlying patterns in students written scientific arguments about a complex scientific phenomenon called Albedo Effect. We further examined how identified patterns compare to existing frameworks related to explaining evidence to support claims and attributing sources of uncertainty. LDA was applied to electronically stored arguments written by 2472 students and concerning how decreases in sea ice affect global temperatures. The results indicated that each content topic identified in the explanations by the LDA— "data only," "reasoning only," "data and reasoning combined," "wrong reasoning types," and "restatement of the claim"—could be interpreted using the claim–evidence–reasoning framework. Similarly, each topic identified in the students' uncertainty attributions— "self-evaluations," "personal sources related to knowledge and experience," and "scientific sources related to reasoning and data"—could be interpreted using the taxonomy of uncertainty attribution. These results indicate that LDA can serve as a tool for content analysis that can discover semantic patterns in students' scientific argumentation in particular science domains and facilitate teachers' providing help to students.

Argument Structure Mining in Scientific Articles: A Comparative Analysis

The Representation of Argumentation in Scientific Papers: A Comparative Analysis of Two Research Areas

Argument ontology for describing scientific articles: A statistical study based on articles from two research areas

Linking Scholarly Contents: The Design and Construction of an Argumentation Graph dagger

Linking the Thoughts Within Scientific Papers: Construction and Visualization of Argumentation Graph

A Joint Framework for Argumentative Text Analysis Incorporating Domain Knowledge

Aspect-Based Argument Mining

A Structure-Aware Argument Encoder for Literature Discourse Analysis.

DMON: A Simple yet Effective Approach for Argument Structure Learning

AntCritic: Argument Mining for Free-Form and Visually-Rich Financial Comments

Towards an Argument Mining Pipeline Transforming Texts to Argument Graphs

Argumentation Mining in User-Generated Web Discourse

A general semi-structured formalism for computational argumentation: Definition, properties, and examples of application.

End-to-End Argument Mining over Varying Rhetorical Structures

Characterizing Argumentation Frameworks with an Extension

Manfred Stede and Jodi Schneider: Argumentation mining. Synthesis lectures on human language technologies, edited by Graeme Hirst

Is Structure Necessary for Modeling Argument Expectations in Distributional Semantics?

Using Argument Mining for Legal Text Summarization

AutoAM: An End-To-End Neural Model for Automatic and Universal Argument Mining

End-to-End Argument Mining for Discussion Threads Based on Parallel Constrained Pointer Architecture

Identifying patterns in students’ scientific argumentation: content analysis through text mining using Latent Dirichlet Allocation