Light acquisition and use by individuals competing in a dense stand of an annual herb, Xanthium canadense

Kouki Hikosaka,Sinya Sudoh,Tadaki Hirose
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s004420050740
1999-03-09
Oecologia
Abstract:Abstract The importance of light acquisition and utilization by individuals in intraspecific competition was evaluated by determining growth and photosynthesis of individual plants in a dense monospecific stand of an annual, Xanthium canadense. Photosynthesis of individual plants in the stand was calculated using a canopy photosynthesis model in which leaf photosynthesis was assumed to be function of leaf nitrogen content and light availability. The estimated photosynthetic rates of individuals were strongly correlated with the measured growth rates. Photosynthetic rates per unit aboveground mass (RPR, relative photosynthetic rate) increased with increasing aboveground mass, suggesting asymmetric (one-sided) competition in the stand. However, larger individuals had similar RPRs, suggesting symmetric (two-sided) competition. These results were consistent with the observation that size inequality over the whole stand increased with growth, but it remained stable among the larger individuals. The RPR of an individual was calculated as the product of absorbed photon flux per unit aboveground mass (Φmass) and light use efficiency (LUE, photosynthesis per unit absorbed photon flux). Φmass indicates the efficiency of light acquisition, and was higher in larger individuals in the stand, while LUE was highest in individuals with intermediate aboveground mass. LUE depends on leaf nitrogen content. At an early stage, leaf nitrogen contents of smaller individuals were similar to those that maximize LUE. Light availability to smaller individuals decreased as they grew, while their nitrogen contents did not change markedly, which decreased their LUE. We concluded that asymmetric competition among individuals in the stand resulted mainly from lower efficiencies in both light acquisition and light use by smaller individuals.
ecology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?