Abstract:Humans often cooperate with strangers, despite the costs involved. A long tradition of theoretical modeling has sought ultimate evolutionary explanations for this seemingly altruistic behavior. More recently, an entirely separate body of experimental work has begun to investigate cooperation's proximate cognitive underpinnings using a dual-process framework: Is deliberative self-control necessary to reign in selfish impulses, or does self-interested deliberation restrain an intuitive desire to cooperate? Integrating these ultimate and proximate approaches, we introduce dual-process cognition into a formal game-theoretic model of the evolution of cooperation. Agents play prisoner's dilemma games, some of which are one-shot and others of which involve reciprocity. They can either respond by using a generalized intuition, which is not sensitive to whether the game is one-shot or reciprocal, or pay a (stochastically varying) cost to deliberate and tailor their strategy to the type of game they are facing. We find that, depending on the level of reciprocity and assortment, selection favors one of two strategies: intuitive defectors who never deliberate, or dual-process agents who intuitively cooperate but sometimes use deliberation to defect in one-shot games. Critically, selection never favors agents who use deliberation to override selfish impulses: Deliberation only serves to undermine cooperation with strangers. Thus, by introducing a formal theoretical framework for exploring cooperation through a dual-process lens, we provide a clear answer regarding the role of deliberation in cooperation based on evolutionary modeling, help to organize a growing body of sometimes-conflicting empirical results, and shed light on the nature of human cognition and social decision making.

Dual-process reflective equilibrium: rethinking the interplay between intuition and reflection in moral reasoning

The dual-process approach to human sociality: Meta-analytic evidence for a theory of internalized heuristics for self-preservation

Priming intuition disfavors instrumental harm but not impartial beneficence

A Cognitive–Intuitionist Model of Moral Judgment

Is the emotional dog wagging its rational tail, or chasing it?

Review Of Research On Moral Intuition And Moral Reasoning

Fairness, fast and slow: A review of dual process models of fairness

Moral rationality and intuition: An exploration of relationships between the Defining Issues Test and the Moral Foundations Questionnaire

Dilemma of Moral Dilemmas:The Conflict Between Emotion and Reasoning in Moral Judgments

Intuition, deliberation, and the evolution of cooperation

Dual Process Theories in Behavioral Economics and Neuroeconomics: a Critical Review

The emotional dog and its rational tail: a social intuitionist approach to moral judgment.

Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition.

Applying process dissociation to self-sacrificial moral dilemmas: Extending the dual-process model

Dual-mode processing in the pursuit of insight is no vice

A dual-process approach to cooperative decision-making under uncertainty

Dual Process Theory: Embodied and Predictive; Symbolic and Classical

Moral Schemas and Tacit Judgement or How the Defining Issues Test is Supported by Cognitive Science

Judgment and Embodied Cognition of Lawyers. Moral Decision-Making and Interoceptive Physiology in the Legal Field

Intellectually Rigorous but Morally Tolerant: Exploring Moral Leniency as a Mediator Between Cognitive Style and "Utilitarian" Judgment

How to activate intuitive and reflective thinking in behavior research? A comprehensive examination of experimental techniques