Abstract:BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: <AbstractText Label="BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES" NlmCategory="OBJECTIVE">Human morality has been investigated using a variety of tasks ranging from judgments of hypothetical dilemmas to viewing morally salient stimuli. These experiments have provided insight into neural correlates of moral judgments and emotions, yet these approaches reveal important differences in moral cognition. Moral reasoning tasks require active deliberation while moral emotion tasks involve the perception of stimuli with moral implications. We examined convergent and divergent brain activity associated with these experimental paradigms taking a quantitative meta-analytic approach.</AbstractText>DATA SOURCE: <AbstractText Label="DATA SOURCE" NlmCategory="METHODS">A systematic search of the literature yielded 40 studies. Studies involving explicit decisions in a moral situation were categorized as active (n = 22); studies evoking moral emotions were categorized as passive (n = 18). We conducted a coordinate-based meta-analysis using the Activation Likelihood Estimation to determine reliable patterns of brain activity.</AbstractText>RESULTS & CONCLUSIONS: <AbstractText Label="RESULTS &amp; CONCLUSIONS" NlmCategory="CONCLUSIONS">Results revealed a convergent pattern of reliable brain activity for both task categories in regions of the default network, consistent with the social and contextual information processes supported by this brain network. Active tasks revealed more reliable activity in the temporoparietal junction, angular gyrus and temporal pole. Active tasks demand deliberative reasoning and may disproportionately involve the retrieval of social knowledge from memory, mental state attribution, and construction of the context through associative processes. In contrast, passive tasks reliably engaged regions associated with visual and emotional information processing, including lingual gyrus and the amygdala. A laterality effect was observed in dorsomedial prefrontal cortex, with active tasks engaging the left, and passive tasks engaging the right. While overlapping activity patterns suggest a shared neural network for both tasks, differential activity suggests that processing of moral input is affected by task demands. The results provide novel insight into distinct features of moral cognition, including the generation of moral context through associative processes and the perceptual detection of moral salience.</AbstractText>

Moral Schemas and Tacit Judgement or How the Defining Issues Test is Supported by Cognitive Science

Moral instinct and moral judgment

Moral rationality and intuition: An exploration of relationships between the Defining Issues Test and the Moral Foundations Questionnaire

Validity study using factor analyses on the Defining Issues Test-2 in undergraduate populations

From Donders’ Dilemma to Objective Internal Assessment: How Experimental Developmental Psychology Can Contribute to Moral Education

Decoding moral judgement from text: a pilot study

Stages of moral judgment development: Applying item response theory to Defining Issues Test data

A Cognitive–Intuitionist Model of Moral Judgment

Moral appraisals guide intuitive legal determinations.

Neural Correlates of Post-Conventional Moral Reasoning: A Voxel-Based Morphometry Study

Dilemma of Moral Dilemmas:The Conflict Between Emotion and Reasoning in Moral Judgments

Temporal Stability of Moral Dilemma Judgments: A Longitudinal Analysis Using the CNI Model

Moral Judgement Development in Higher Education: Insights from the Defining Issues Test

Moral dynamics: Grounding moral judgment in intuitive physics and intuitive psychology

Measuring moral reasoning using moral dilemmas: evaluating reliability, validity, and differential item functioning of the behavioural defining issues test (bDIT)

The neural processing of moral sensitivity to issues of justice and care

Is the emotional dog wagging its rational tail, or chasing it?

Intellectually Rigorous but Morally Tolerant: Exploring Moral Leniency as a Mediator Between Cognitive Style and "Utilitarian" Judgment

Moral trade-offs reveal foundational representations that predict unique variance in political attitudes

Contextual and Perceptual Brain Processes Underlying Moral Cognition: A Quantitative Meta-Analysis of Moral Reasoning and Moral Emotions

Dual-process reflective equilibrium: rethinking the interplay between intuition and reflection in moral reasoning