Abstract:The Defining Issues Test (DIT) aimed to measure one's moral judgment development in terms of moral reasoning. The Neo-Kohlbergian approach, which is an elaboration of Kohlbergian theory, focuses on the continuous development of postconventional moral reasoning, which constitutes the theoretical basis of the DIT. However, very few studies have directly tested the internal structure of the DIT, which would indicate its construct validity.Using the DIT-2, a later revision of the DIT, we examined whether a bi-factor model or 3-factor CFA model showed a better model fit. The Neo-Kohlbergian theory of moral judgment development, which constitutes the theoretical basis for the DIT-2, proposes that moral judgment development occurs continuously and that it can be better explained with a soft-stage model. Given these assertions, we assumed that the bi-factor model, which considers the Schema-General Moral Judgment (SGMJ), might be more consistent with Neo-Kohlbergian theory.We analyzed a large dataset collected from undergraduate students. We performed confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) via weighted least squares. A 3-factor CFA based on the DIT-2 manual and a bi-factor model were compared for model fit. The three factors in the 3-factor CFA were labeled as moral development schemas in Neo-Kohlbergian theory (i.e., personal interests, maintaining norms, and postconventional schemas). The bi-factor model included the SGMJ in addition to the three factors.In general, the bi-factor model showed a better model fit compared with the 3-factor CFA model although both models reported acceptable model fit indices.We found that the DIT-2 scale is a valid measure of the internal structure of moral reasoning development using both CFA and bi-factor models. In addition, we conclude that the soft-stage model, posited by the Neo-Kohlbergian approach to moral judgment development, can be better supported with the bi-factor model that was tested in the present study.

Temporal Stability of Moral Dilemma Judgments: A Longitudinal Analysis Using the CNI Model

Using the CNI Model to Investigate Individual Differences in Moral Dilemma Judgments

Temporal Distance,Automatic Activation of Self-discrepancy and Value Orientation

Deconfounding the effects of acute stress on abstract moral dilemma judgment

Beyond Trolleyology: The CNI Model of Moral-Dilemma Responses

Political Ideology and Moral Dilemma Judgments: An Analysis Using the CNI Model

Daily moral identity: Linkages with integrity and compassion

Revisiting the divide between deontology and utilitarianism in moral dilemma judgment: A multinomial modeling approach.

Intellectually Rigorous but Morally Tolerant: Exploring Moral Leniency as a Mediator Between Cognitive Style and "Utilitarian" Judgment

Validity study using factor analyses on the Defining Issues Test-2 in undergraduate populations

Situational Moral Evaluations: The Role of Rationalizations & Moral Identity

Influences of past moral behavior on future behavior: A review of sequential moral behavior studies using meta-analytic techniques.

Moral Schemas and Tacit Judgement or How the Defining Issues Test is Supported by Cognitive Science

Moral reasoning and moral competence as predictors of cooperative behavior in a social dilemma

How Likely Is it that I Would Act the Same Way: Modeling Moral Judgment During Uncertainty

Moral rationality and intuition: An exploration of relationships between the Defining Issues Test and the Moral Foundations Questionnaire

Living Slow and Being Moral : Life History Predicts the Dual Process of Other-Centered Reasoning and Judgments

Moral Future-Thinking: Does the Moral Circle Stand the Test of Time?

Dilemma of Moral Dilemmas:The Conflict Between Emotion and Reasoning in Moral Judgments

Differences in the justification of choices in moral dilemmas: Effects of gender, time pressure and dilemma seriousness

Moral preference reversals: Violations of procedure invariance in moral judgments of sacrificial dilemmas