Abstract:The Defining Issues Test (DIT) aimed to measure one's moral judgment development in terms of moral reasoning. The Neo-Kohlbergian approach, which is an elaboration of Kohlbergian theory, focuses on the continuous development of postconventional moral reasoning, which constitutes the theoretical basis of the DIT. However, very few studies have directly tested the internal structure of the DIT, which would indicate its construct validity.Using the DIT-2, a later revision of the DIT, we examined whether a bi-factor model or 3-factor CFA model showed a better model fit. The Neo-Kohlbergian theory of moral judgment development, which constitutes the theoretical basis for the DIT-2, proposes that moral judgment development occurs continuously and that it can be better explained with a soft-stage model. Given these assertions, we assumed that the bi-factor model, which considers the Schema-General Moral Judgment (SGMJ), might be more consistent with Neo-Kohlbergian theory.We analyzed a large dataset collected from undergraduate students. We performed confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) via weighted least squares. A 3-factor CFA based on the DIT-2 manual and a bi-factor model were compared for model fit. The three factors in the 3-factor CFA were labeled as moral development schemas in Neo-Kohlbergian theory (i.e., personal interests, maintaining norms, and postconventional schemas). The bi-factor model included the SGMJ in addition to the three factors.In general, the bi-factor model showed a better model fit compared with the 3-factor CFA model although both models reported acceptable model fit indices.We found that the DIT-2 scale is a valid measure of the internal structure of moral reasoning development using both CFA and bi-factor models. In addition, we conclude that the soft-stage model, posited by the Neo-Kohlbergian approach to moral judgment development, can be better supported with the bi-factor model that was tested in the present study.

Moral Judgement Development in Higher Education: Insights from the Defining Issues Test

Does Moral Education Improve Moral Judgment? A Meta-Analysis of Intervention Studies Using the Defining Issues Test

Moral rationality and intuition: An exploration of relationships between the Defining Issues Test and the Moral Foundations Questionnaire

The Defining Issues Test and the Four Component Model: Contributions to professional education

Improving moral reasoning among college students: a game-based learning approach

Evaluating moral reasoning in nursing education

Validity study using factor analyses on the Defining Issues Test-2 in undergraduate populations

How not to evaluate a psychological measure: Rebuttal to criticism of the Defining Issues Test of moral judgment development by Curzer and colleagues

Stages of moral judgment development: Applying item response theory to Defining Issues Test data

Ethical Standards in Higher Education

Moral Development in Adolescence: A Test of Change and Influences in Context of Sat with German Panel Data

Moral education: the cultural significance of higher education in the discourse of non-traditional undergraduates

Moral Schemas and Tacit Judgement or How the Defining Issues Test is Supported by Cognitive Science

Moral content and assignment marking: an exploratory study

Insights From the Defining Issues Test on Moral Reasoning Competencies Development in Community Pharmacists

Moral Education: An Evaluation of the Effect of Moral Dilemma Discussions for Sixth Graders

Moral Development in Business Ethics: An Examination and Critique

Moral Behaviour in Organizations: The Contribution of Management Education and Development

Commencing character: A case study of character development in college

Moral Reasoning of Chinese Accounting Students and Practitioners

EFFECTS OF GENDER AND EDUCATION ON THE MORAL REASONING OF KUWAIT UNIVERSITY STUDENTS