Abstract:Panel data fail to support a subjective expected utility model of corporate deterrence. There is partial confirmation, however, that chief executives of small organizations who perceive the certainty of detection as high have better regulatory compliance in their organizations. Perceived sanction threats do not work significantly more effectively for chief executives (a) of for-profit versus nonprofit organizations; (b) who are owners as well as managers; (c) who say they think about sanctions more (sanction salience); and (d) who have a weaker belief in the law. Nor does the effectiveness of corporate deterrents depend on compliance costs. There is, however, a significant deterrent effect for managers who are low on emotionality, but an opposite counter-deterrent effect for actors high on emotionality. This supports the critique of those who condemn rational actor models from a sociology of the emotions perspective. Emotions of guilt among managers predict the subsequent compliance of their organizations. The results are consistent with perceptual deterrent studies of individuals that find little effect of formal sanctions and social disapproval as deterrents, but stronger support for an effect of self-disapproval (guilt or shame) on law observance. Qualitative data are used to show why it would be folly to interpret these results as showing that business regulation can work without sanction threats and social disapproval. Rather, the data evince the need for a complete reconceptionalization of the way policy analysts think about the deterrence of law breaking.

Political Instability and the Failure of Deterrence

The Dynamics of Instability

Deterrence Theory and the Spiral Model Revisited

Threats and Political Instability in Authoritarian Regimes: A Dynamic Theoretical Analysis

Mistrust, Misperception, and Misunderstanding: Imperfect Information and Conflict Dynamics

Apparent Strength Conceals Instability in a Model for the Collapse of Historical States

A model of conflict and leadership: Is there a hawkish drift in politics?

The Dialectics of Corporate Deterrence

Coercion and Provocation

Success of economic sanctions threats: coercion, information and commitment

Analysis of strategic and deterrence equilibrium by modeling with a Van der Waals gas

Strategy Under Uncertainty: International Conflict and Variation in Information

Corruption dynamics and political instability

External Threats, Political Turnover and Fiscal Capacity

Common Misunderstandings of Deterrence Theory in Information Systems Research and Future Research Directions

Conflict under the shadow of elections

Domestic constraints in crisis bargaining

Self-control of states: bridging social psychology to international relations discourses

Governments, publics, and enemies: Intragroup dynamics as barriers to conflict resolution

Alliances and Conflict, or Conflict and Alliances? Appraising the Causal Effect of Alliances on Conflict

Dynamics and Stability under Iterated Sanctions and Counter-sanctions