Abstract:<p>For encouraging the manufacturer and supplier to innovate in carbon reduction technology, the government tends to set a number of mandatory standards and some punitive measures in practice. However, research on the regulatory ability of the government and the relationship between governmental regulation and enterprises' carbon reduction technology innovation is often neglected. Thus, the bilateral interaction mechanism between the government and enterprises should be established in which enterprises and governments constantly adjust individual decisions to response to the other, so as to improve the carbon emission reduction of enterprises and the level of government regulation. We use differential game methods to study the interaction between carbon reduction technology innovation and government intervention under decentralized decision without cost sharing, decentralized decision with cost sharing and centralized decision respectively. We find that the optimal level of carbon reduction technology innovation under decentralized decision is the same as centralized situation when there is no cost sharing. Furthermore, the optimal levels of government intervention are also the same in both cases. However, the optimal level of carbon reduction technology innovation and government intervention will be improved only in the case that cost-sharing proportion reaches a certain range. Therefore, a positive interaction mechanism between carbon reduction technology innovation of enterprise and intervention of government can be established. Theoretically, our paper reveals a new perspective in the research of the relationship between government and enterprises in the process of carbon reduction technology innovation and use differential game methods to study the interaction between carbon reduction technology innovation and government intervention. In practice, this paper can help government and enterprises to form a closer cooperative relationship in reducing carbon emissions. The government should give full consideration for enterprises' actual production capacity when taking intervention measures. Meanwhile, enterprises should refer to the intervention indicators of the government when conducting carbon reduction technology innovations.</p>

Non-cooperative Mode, Cost-Sharing Mode, or Cooperative Mode: Which is the Optimal Mode for Desertification Control?

Research on the optimal desertification combat mode considering the governance cycle

Pesticide control, physical control, or biological control? How to manage forest pests and diseases more effectively

How to promote agricultural enterprises to reduce the use of pesticides and fertilizers? An evolutionary game approach

Improving interaction mechanism of carbon reduction technology innovation between supply chain enterprises and government by means of differential game

How to improve the function of government carbon tax in promoting enterprise carbon emission reduction: from the perspective of three-stage dynamic game

An Evolutionary Game Model for the Multi-Agent Co-Governance of Agricultural Non-Point Source Pollution Control under Intensive Management Pattern in China

Hands-off, artificial construction, or penalty? How to deal with the increasingly polluted coastal wetland ecosystem in China

Tripartite evolutionary game analysis on corporate carbon reduction decisions considering dual supervision under carbon trading

Research on improvement strategies for low-carbon technology innovation based on a differential game: The perspective of tax competition

Government regulation, horizontal coopetition, and low-carbon technology innovation: A tripartite evolutionary game analysis of government and homogeneous energy enterprises

Government Participation in Supply Chain Low-Carbon Technology R&D and Green Marketing Strategy Optimization

Interest Equilibrium and Path Choice in the Development of Construction Land Decrement: A Theoretical Analysis Based on the Multi-Agent Game Model

Differential Game Analysis of Carbon Emission Reduction Effect and Price Strategy Considering Government Intervention and Manufacturer Competition

The Government–Farmer Cooperation Mechanism and Its Implementation Path to Realize the Goals of Optimizing Grain Planting Structure

A Tripartite Game Analysis of Environmental Pollution Control Based on Complicated Intergovernmental Relations

Evolutionary game analysis of government, businesses, and consumers in high-standard farmland low-carbon construction

Government Intervention and Subjectivity of Non-State-Owned Enterprises under “Double Carbon” Target

Research on the cooperative mechanism of government and enterprise for basin ecological compensation based on differential game

Evolutionary Game of Pesticide Reduction Management for Sustainable Agriculture: An Analysis Based on Local Governments, Farmers, and Consumers

Research on mechanisms to incentivize corporate environmental responsibility based on a differential game approach