Abstract:In order to alleviate the grain supply–demand structural contradictions and ensure the realization of grain planting structure optimization goals, it is necessary to clarify the interactive relationship between multiple entities, establish a cooperation mechanism, and explore its implementation paths. To this end, a differential game model is built to compare and analyze the optimal strategies, optimal benefits, and overall system outcomes for both the government and farmers under three scenarios: the Nash non-cooperative game, the Stackelberg game, and the collaborative cooperation game. Then, key factors and their influencing mechanisms that affect the government–farmer cooperation mechanism are revealed. Finally, the csQCA model is used to explore the implementation paths for different stakeholders to ensure the sound operation of the cooperation mechanism. The results show the following: (1) The government–farmer cooperation mechanism should consist of an inner core system with the government–farmer interaction as the core and an outer system comprising the market environment, cooperation environment, and institutional environment. These two systems should coordinate with each other, respond to each other, and drive progress together. (2) The cooperation mechanism can optimize behavioral enthusiasm, resulting in individual and overall benefits for both the government and farmers. However, its scientific and orderly implementation is affected by factors such as the cost coefficient. Additionally, subsidies serve as a powerful policy tool to enhance farmers' enthusiasm, thereby increasing the benefits for both parties and maximizing the effectiveness of the cooperation mechanism. (3) There are three implementation paths corresponding to large-scale farmers, rural elites, and small-scale farmers: being led by external policy tools, linkage guidance between decision-making environment and willing subjects, and factor allocation and environmentally driven decision-making. These findings can provide theoretical support and case reference for marginal farmland management and planting structure optimization management in underdeveloped areas.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
### What problem does this paper attempt to solve?
This paper aims to address the issue of the cooperation mechanism between the government and farmers in the process of optimizing the grain planting structure. Specifically, the paper focuses on the following points:
1. **Grain supply and demand contradiction**: Due to factors such as climate change, human activities, and increasingly severe resource and environmental constraints, coupled with external factors like the COVID-19 pandemic, the Russia-Ukraine war, and international trade frictions, the uncertainty of supply in the international grain market has increased. In China, although the overall grain supply and demand are basically balanced, structural contradictions are prominent, such as corn surplus and high dependence on soybean imports.
2. **Planting structure adjustment**: To optimize the planting structure, the Chinese government has introduced a series of policies since 2016, such as the "sickle bend" region corn structure adjustment policy, aimed at reducing corn planting areas and promoting new planting and industrial structures. However, farmers face challenges in adjusting their original planting behaviors when confronted with new crop types and planting modes, making it difficult to show the expected enthusiasm.
3. **Establishment of cooperation mechanism**: The paper constructs a differential game model (including Nash non-cooperative game, Stackelberg game, and collaborative cooperative game) to analyze the optimal strategies, optimal benefits, and overall system efficiency of the government and farmers under different scenarios. It also reveals the key factors affecting the government-farmer cooperation mechanism and their mechanisms of action.
4. **Exploration of implementation paths**: The paper further uses the csQCA model to explore the implementation paths for different stakeholders to ensure the smooth operation of the cooperation mechanism. The study finds that the cooperation mechanism should consist of a core system centered on government-farmer interaction and an external system that includes the market environment, cooperation environment, and institutional environment. These systems coordinate and respond to each other, jointly promoting progress. Additionally, subsidies, as a powerful policy tool, can enhance farmers' enthusiasm, thereby increasing the benefits for both parties and maximizing the effectiveness of the cooperation mechanism.
In summary, through theoretical analysis and empirical research, this paper provides theoretical support and case references for the management of marginal arable land and the adjustment of planting structures in underdeveloped areas.