Abstract:Abstract Polarization has been a prevalent phenomenon in US politics, yet its foreign policy implications remain understudied. A common assumption is that polarization undermines the utilization of United States’ material power via a coherent grand strategy. In this article, I argue that polarization does not make the United States incapable of enacting a foreign policy per se but instead affects US foreign policy conduct, power, and strategy toward international negotiations. The effects of domestic polarization for US foreign policy behavior in international negotiations are best understood via an advanced application of the “two-level game” model, which conceptualizes a state's domestic politics as a determinant factor for the executive branch's approach toward foreign affairs. I identify three effects polarization has on US foreign policy: (1) a sorting effect, which produces homogenous partisan coalitions with divergent foreign policy preferences and inclines the executive to pursue an obstinate international negotiation conduct; (2) a partisan conflict effect, which weakens Congress as a veto player and reduces United States’ bargaining power; and, finally, (3) an institutional corrosion effect, which inclines the executive branch to manipulate domestic support and to politicize international negotiations at home. In sum, domestic polarization increases the opportunity costs for US foreign policy toward international negotiations and contributes to global instability. Anecdotal evidence from US foreign policy over the last decade offers support for these effects, but further empirical research is needed to better understand when they are most impactful and in which combination these effects appear.

Two-level game operational code: analysis of foreign and domestic policy preferences of national leaders

From One-Level Games to Two-Level Games:The Evolution of China’s Foreign Policy-Making Model

Rank Preserving Preferences

The Integrative Effects of Leading by Example and Follower Traits in Public Goods Game: A Multilevel Study

Conceptualizing the Effects of Polarization for US Foreign Policy Behavior in International Negotiations: Revisiting the Two-Level Game

Mean Field Analysis of Two-Party Governance: Competition versus Cooperation among Leaders

Analysis of Multilevel Replicator Dynamics for General Two-Strategy Social Dilemmas

On decentralized computation of the leader's strategy in bi-level games

On the limits of hierarchy in public goods games: A survey and meta-analysis on the effects of design variables on cooperation

The Application of Non-Cooperative Stackelberg Game Theory in Behavioral Science: Social Optimality with any Number of Players

Cognitive Hierarchies in Multi-Stage Games of Incomplete Information: Theory and Experiment

Dynamic feedback Stackelberg games with alternating leaders

Strong Stackelberg reasoning in symmetric games: An experimental replication and extension

Stackelberg Solutions in an Opinion Dynamics Game with Stubborn Agents

Top-Bottom Hierarchy: An Economic Analysis of the U.S. Overseas Military Investment*

Threats and Political Instability in Authoritarian Regimes: A Dynamic Theoretical Analysis

Let the Powerful People Do Tricky Things: How Leaders’ or Subordinates’ Political Behavior Copes with High Job Demands

Learning Optimal Strategies to Commit To.

Linear-quadratic two-person differential game: Nash game versus Stackelberg game, local information versus global information

Revisiting Putnam’s two-level game theory in the digital age: domestic digital diplomacy and the Iran nuclear deal

Cognitive hierarchy theory and two-person games