Abstract:Peer punishment is regarded as an important element in sustaining human cooperation for public good provision. Many behavioral experiments have shown that public good provision is higher if cooperation norms can be enforced by peer punishment. However, these experiments predominantly focus on single-group public goods, in which people have to choose between their private interests and the interests of their group. In many societal problems, people are involved in multilevel public goods problems, where multiple local groups are nested within a larger global group. We study experimentally how punishment affects cooperation and norms in multilevel public goods games. In our games, two local groups are nested within a larger global group. Participants have to choose between not contributing, contributing locally, and contributing globally. Local contributions would lead to a polarized outcome where two separate local public goods are provided, whereas global contributions would lead to a unified global good that benefits all. Moreover, we study whether cooperation and punishment patterns depend on the type of public good participants are initially exposed to: single-group or multilevel. Participants either begin in a single-group public goods game and then shift to a multilevel public goods game or vice versa. We find that punishment is less effective in multilevel public goods games than in single-group public goods games. In particular, punishment only promotes cooperation in multilevel public goods games if people have prior experience with solving single-group public goods games. Our results refine the boundary conditions for the effectiveness of punishment and suggest that 'starting small' by first solving single-group public goods problems is necessary for successful multilevel public good provision.

On the limits of hierarchy in public goods games: A survey and meta-analysis on the effects of design variables on cooperation

Cooperation and Charity in Spatial Public Goods Game under Different Strategy Update Rules

The Integrative Effects of Leading by Example and Follower Traits in Public Goods Game: A Multilevel Study

Rank Preserving Preferences

Human cooperation in changing groups in a large-scale public goods game

Cooperation, punishment, and group change in multilevel public goods experiments

Strategic Games on a Hierarchical Network Model

Long-term evidence on cooperation and cultural differences in public goods dilemmas

Group size effect on cooperation in one-shot social dilemmas II. Curvilinear effect

Social rank and social cooperation: Impact of social comparison processes on cooperative decision-making

Can Leading by Example Alone Improve Cooperation?

Low-cost, high-impact altruistic punishment promotes cooperation cascades in human social networks

The spatial public goods game on hypergraphs with heterogeneous investment

The dynamics of human behavior in the public goods game with institutional incentives

Group-size effects on the evolution of cooperation in the spatial public goods game

Understanding spatial public goods games on three-layer networks

Explaining Cooperative Behavior in Public Goods Games: How Preferences and Beliefs Affect Contribution Levels

Higher-Order Interactions and Zero-Determinant Strategies in the Public Goods Game.

The Effect of Bounded Rationality on Human Cooperation with Voluntary Participation

Adaptive and Bounded Investment Returns Promote Cooperation in Spatial Public Goods Games

Time-dependent effects hinder cooperation on the public goods game