Abstract:Understanding the evolution of sociality in humans and other species requires understanding how selection on social behaviour varies with group size. However, the effects of group size are frequently obscured in the theoretical literature, which often makes assumptions that are at odds with empirical findings. In particular, mechanisms are suggested as supporting large-scale cooperation when they would in fact rapidly become ineffective with increasing group size. Here we review the literature on the evolution of helping behaviours (cooperation and altruism), and frame it using a simple synthetic model that allows us to delineate how the three main components of the selection pressure on helping must vary with increasing group size. The first component is the marginal benefit of helping to group members, which determines both direct fitness benefits to the actor and indirect fitness benefits to recipients. While this is often assumed to be independent of group size, marginal benefits are in practice likely to be maximal at intermediate group sizes for many types of collective action problems, and will eventually become very small in large groups due to the law of decreasing marginal returns. The second component is the response of social partners on the past play of an actor, which underlies conditional behaviour under repeated social interactions. We argue that under realistic conditions on the transmission of information in a population, this response on past play decreases rapidly with increasing group size so that reciprocity alone (whether direct, indirect, or generalised) cannot sustain cooperation in very large groups. The final component is the relatedness between actor and recipient, which, according to the rules of inheritance, again decreases rapidly with increasing group size. These results explain why helping behaviours in very large social groups are limited to cases where the number of reproducing individuals is small, as in social insects, or where there are social institutions that can promote (possibly through sanctioning) large-scale cooperation, as in human societies. Finally, we discuss how individually devised institutions can foster the transition from small-scale to large-scale cooperative groups in human evolution.

Group size effect on cooperation in one-shot social dilemmas II. Curvilinear effect

Group size effect on cooperation in social dilemmas

Group-size effects on the evolution of cooperation in the spatial public goods game

Human cooperation in changing groups in a large-scale public goods game

When is bigger better? The effects of group size on the evolution of helping behaviours

The Evolution of Cooperation in Spatial Groups

Long-term evidence on cooperation and cultural differences in public goods dilemmas

Increasing benefits in one-time public goods does not promote cooperation

The Effect of Bounded Rationality on Human Cooperation with Voluntary Participation

Group-size dependent synergy in heterogeneous populations

Explaining Cooperative Behavior in Public Goods Games: How Preferences and Beliefs Affect Contribution Levels

Analysing public goods games using reinforcement learning: effect of increasing group size on cooperation

Reducing the bystander effect via decreasing group size to solve the collective-risk social dilemma

Does strong heterogeneity promote cooperation by group interactions?

A generalized public goods game with coupling of individual ability and project benefit

Explosive Cooperation in Social Dilemmas on Higher-Order Networks

Interplay of Reward and Size of Groups in the Optional Public Goods Game

On the limits of hierarchy in public goods games: A survey and meta-analysis on the effects of design variables on cooperation

Real-effort in the Multilevel Public Goods Game

Cooperation and Control in Multiplayer Social Dilemmas

: A Neurocognitive Mechanism for Increased Cooperation During Group Formation