Abstract:Due to a rapid economic growth over the past several decades China has significantly strengthened its international positions. This growth in its own turn was to a large extent due to a pragmatic and sound foreign strategy that the country has been pursuing since mid-1970s. However, in recent years both within and outside China there has been an on-going debate on the alleged radical transformation of the PRC’s perceptions of its national interests, its place in world politics, and its foreign policy. The variety of opinions becomes increasingly complicated as the number of discussants grows and new arguments are adduced in support of different positions. Whereas outside China this debate structures around the narrative of the Chinese assertiveness, within the country the main dispute is between the advocates of a traditional policy of ‘keeping a low profile’ (taoguang yanghui) and proponents of a new ‘striving for achievements’ (fenfa youwei) strategy. The present paper aims to provide a framework for a systematization of debates on the contemporary foreign policy of China in the English language academic literature based on two criteria: whether a researcher admits that the Chinese foreign policy is changing and how he assesses implications of these changes. Such an approach undoubtedly entails certain schematization of the presented views and arguments. However, it differs favorably from traditional, more narrative approaches to conceptualization of the debate since it establishes a clear, transparent theoretical framework aimed to identify the substantive core of the presented views. This, in turn, can bring about a better understanding of the current state and possible evolution of Chinese foreign policy in general. The author concludes that although these debates are far from being over, most researchers admit the PRC’s foreign policy strategy is undergoing a radical transformation. Since the latter half of 2000s there has been a steady trend in the foreign policy of China towards greater assertiveness. At the same time this transformation ensures continuity of the basic principles of Chinese diplomacy. All this means that further debates on the Chinese foreign policy should focus primarily on potential implications of this transformation for the PRC, the regional dynamics and international relations system as a whole.

Hardening Chinese Realpolitik in the 21st Century: The Evolution of Beijing’s Thinking about Arms Control

Analysis on the Strategic Stability between China and the United States

Are they reading Schelling in Beijing? The dimensions, drivers, and risks of nuclear-conventional entanglement in China

Chinese Strategic Culture and the Use of Force: moral and political perspectives

Revisiting China's Use of Force in Asia: Dynamic, Level and Beyond*

China’s arms trade: trends and challenges

Debates on Changes in the Foreign Policy of Contemporary China (A Case Study of the English Language Academic Publications)

"Soft Implementation Constraint" and Political Gaming in China's Nuclear Power Puzzles

China's Search for Assured Retaliation: The Evolution of Chinese Nuclear Strategy and Force Structure

China's Anti-Access Strategy in Historical and Theoretical Perspective

China'S Nuclear Perspective: Deterrence Reduction, Nuclear Non-Proliferation, and Disarmament

Is a New Cold War Inevitable? Chinese Perspectives on US–China Strategic Competition

Sources and limits of Chinese ‘soft power’

On China’s Modern Foreign Policy Through the Prism of the Concepts of “Dao” and “Shi”

Securing China's core interests: the state of the debate in China

An Analysis of the Core Concepts of the Bush Administration's Security Policy toward China

Cold War History Studies in China in the 21st Century: The State of the Field

Development of the Chinese A2/AD System in the Context of US–China Relations

The evolution of China's climate change policy: international and domestic political economy and a strategy for working with China

U.S. strategy of damage limitation vis-à-vis China: long-term programs and effects

On Obama Administration's Nuclear Nonproliferation Policies