Abstract:Three major concerns drove the U.S. into initiating the trade war, and they are (a) the concern that China’s chronically large trade surplus was depressing job creation in the U.S. (b) the concern that China was using illegal and unfair methods to acquire U.S. technology at an effectively discounted price; and (c) the concern that China seeks to weaken U.S. national security and its international standing. On the dispute over China’s exchange rate and trade imbalance, the first conclusion is that it was marked by analytical confusion over the meaning of the term ‘equilibrium exchange rate’. The second conclusion is that China’s trade imbalance reflects the economic conditions in both China and U.S., and that the efficient and fair solution of the problem requires policy changes in both countries. On the industrial policy dispute, the first conclusion is that the issue of forced technology transfer is largely a dispute about China using its market power to benefit itself at the expense of its trade partners. The second conclusion is that China’s use of market power can last only until the other large countries could unite and retaliate as a group. The inevitability of retaliation means that China should replace the joint-venture (JV) mechanism for technological diffusion with other ways to strengthen its technological capability. On the U.S. concern about whether China trade weakens its national security, the first conclusion is that the notion of national security that is commonly adopted in the U.S. trade policy debate is ignorant about the primary determinants of U.S. capability in innovation. By focusing instead mainly on how to hold down China technologically, the long-run outcome will be a technologically weaker U.S. and hence, a more vulnerable U.S. The second conclusion is that the U.S. must identify a clear, short list of critical technologies and critical infrastructure for the recently reformed Committee for Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) to cover, and update this list constantly. Otherwise, the broad and changing nature of notions about national security would allow the bureaucratically driven phenomenon of mission-creep to steadily expand the coverage of the CFIUS process, thereby steadily rendering CFIUS to be operationally capricious. Our principal policy suggestion to China is that, because China’s economy in 2018 is very different from that in 1978 (e.g. many parts of China now look like Singapore and China is Africa’s biggest donor), there should be more reciprocity in China’s trade and investment relations with the advanced economies despite China’s status as a developing economy under WTO rules. Our principal policy suggestion to President Trump is to stop equating strategic competition with economic competition. Strategic competition is normally a zero-sum game. While fair economic competition is usually a zero-sum game in the short run, it generally creates a win-win outcome in the long run.

An Analysis of the Core Concepts of the Bush Administration's Security Policy toward China

An Analysis of the Evolution and Basic Characteristics of U. S. Policy towards Taiwan

US Taiwan Policy of Strategic Ambiguity: A Dilemma of Deterrence

America's Response to China's Rising Influence in Asia

An Onslaught Against China ' s Diplomacy and Security from the Obama Administration ' s Adjustments to its Asia-Pacific Strategy

China and the United States in East Asia

Understanding the U.S.-China Trade War

Mainland China Debates U.S. Pivot/Rebalancing to Asia

The United States’s Selective Containment Policy and Its “Pivot to Asia”

Exploring the Boundaries of China-US Strategic Competition

Securing China's core interests: the state of the debate in China

One Administration, Two Voices: US China Policy During Bush's First Term

The “managed competition” concept in the US–China security nexus. Theoretical analysis and practical implementation

Analysis on the Strategic Stability between China and the United States

Analysis on the Political Factors in Sino-US Economic and Trade Relation

On China’s Modern Foreign Policy Through the Prism of the Concepts of “Dao” and “Shi”

American Reflections on the Engagement with China and Responses to President Xi’s New Model of Major Power Relations

Analysis of the Causes and Countermeasures of the Escalation of Sino-US Trade Friction

Interests,strategies and the Contradictory Nature of the U.S.Policy toward the Taiwan Strait

U.S.Congress,Presidency,and China Policy:Changes,Debates and Agendas

Unbalanced deterrence: coercive threat, reassurance and the US-China rivalry in Taiwan strait