Abstract:When President Obama visited Australia in November 2011, he was very direct concerning the future American role in the Asia-Pacific region: "As President, therefore, I have made a deliberate and strategic decision--as a Pacific nation, the United States will play a larger and long-term role in shaping this region and its future, by upholding core principles and in close partnership with our allies and friends." (1) The Asia-Pacific region currently forms the epicenter of world affairs and incorporates the majority of great powers (emerging and confirmed), most nuclear powers, and more than one-third of the world's population. Although the region is the new global economic driving force, security challenges remain (piracy, terrorism, nuclear proliferation, natural resources, border issues, etc.). Economic interdependence has not negated the risk of conflict; tensions remain with regard to the Korean peninsula, Taiwan, and the maritime border disputes in the South China Sea. As General Martin E. Dempsey summed it, "All of the trends, demographic trends, geopolitical trends, economic trends and military trends are shifting toward the Pacific. So our strategic challenges in the future will largely emanate out of the Pacific region, but also the littorals of the Indian Ocean." (2) In the current context of transitioning the balance of power toward Asia, the zone extending from the Gulf of Bengal to the Sea of Japan has become even more of a vital interest for Washington. Although the United States still dominates in the Pacific, it is less so than in the past, a reflection of Asia undergoing profound change. As mentioned in the Sustaining US Global Leadership: Priorities for 21st Century Defense document, the United States has reached an "inflection point," (3) and although the words "relative decline" or "overstretch" are not pronounced, the "unipolar moment," as defined by the syndicated columnist Charles Krauthammer, is ending. With that thought as a discerning factor, the United States has established new priorities and reinforced its diplomatic and military presence in an attempt to ensure Pax Americana in the Pacific. In November 2011, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton wrote an article in Foreign Policy, entitled "America's Pacific Century." The article was precise and left no doubt regarding the United States' intentions and objectives. Clinton established six priorities: * Reinforce bilateral alliances. * Deepen relations with emerging powers (China among others). * Reengage with multilateral regional institutions. * Expand commerce and investments. * Forge a large military presence. * Advance democracy and human rights. (4) Although the relationship with China is addressed at length in the article, two countries receive particular attention--India and Indonesia. In the document Sustaining US Global Leadership. Priorities for 21st Century Defense, published in January 2012, US leaders confirm these policies: US economic and security interests are inextricably linked to developments in the arc extending from the Western Pacific and East Asia into the Indian Ocean region and South Asia, creating a mix of evolving challenges and opportunities. Accordingly, while the US military will continue to contribute to security globally, we will of necessity rebalance toward the Asia-Pacific region. (5) The document also directs the protection of the "global commons, those areas beyond national jurisdiction that constitute the vital connective tissue of the international system." (6) To these ends, on a military level, the traditional alliances with Japan, South Korea, Australia, the Philippines, and Thailand had served as the bedrock for this policy, but the updated version goes beyond these core partners; new relationships and capacities are outlined for development. In the wake of this adaptation and adjustment of the security architecture, one nation in particular receives special attention--China. …

The United States’s Selective Containment Policy and Its “Pivot to Asia”

The Containment Thinking in the Evolution of American Geopolitical Strategy: from "Selective Containment"to "Indo-Pacific"Strategy

An Onslaught Against China ' s Diplomacy and Security from the Obama Administration ' s Adjustments to its Asia-Pacific Strategy

An Analysis of the Core Concepts of the Bush Administration's Security Policy toward China

Mainland China Debates U.S. Pivot/Rebalancing to Asia

Connotation and Dilemma of the US Indo-Pacific Strategy and China’s Responses

East Asian Integration and the Strategic Countermeasure of the U.S.

The Adjustments of U.S.Policies Towards China under Economic and Security Rebalance

China's Expanding Influence in the Asia-Pacific: Strategic Implications for the United States

Contiguity with China: Preliminary Reaction of the U.S. Towards China's Rise——A Case Study of Clinton Government

Thinking Inertia and Path Dependence in Indo-Pacific Strategy of the United States

Implementation Paths and Restrictive Factors of the U.S. Pivot to the Asia-Pacific Region

The Logical Contradictions of the US Indo-Pacific Strategy and China’s Response

Analyzing United States Pivot to Asia and China’s Global Rebalancing through Belt and Road Initiative (BRI)

Defining China–US Strategic Competition: Partisan Realignment and the Domestic Political Logic of Change in American Strategy Toward China, 2009–2020

The U.S. Hegemony in the Post-crisis Era and China-U.S. Gamesmanship in the Asia-Pacific

The Reassertion of the United States in the Asia-Pacific Region

A Review of the U.S.'s Strategy towards Asia

From Partner to Competitor: The Proximization Analysis of the National Security Strategy of the United States of America from Three Administrations

The U.S. Global Strategy as Seen from the Debate of the Primary Election

The Trend of Indo-Pacific Strategy and Its Impact on the US-Japan Alliance ——Creation and Evolution of the Double Ambiguity, Double Guarantee and Double Containment Strategy