Abstract:Purpose - The purpose of the study is to investigate what values are now important to young American and Chinese managers, since they profile the direction in which their country is headed. It aims to explore if the ethical values of young executives in different countries are converging to a common global business culture. It also aims to argue that the individualism-collectivism value dimension by itself does not capture the differences between the Chinese and American sample members. The vertical-horizontal dimension, in contrast, seems to better delineate the value orientations among young executives in the two countries. Design/methodology/approach - In this two-phase study, both attitudinal and scenario-based measurements are applied to assess the strength of work value orientations among similar subjects in China and the USA. Findings - In study 1, Chinese respondents score significantly higher on a hierarchical-vertical dimension than do the Americans, although the two groups do not differ significantly on the collectivism-individualism dimension. In study 2, which entails resolving an ethical dilemma, the American subjects apply Egalitarianism as their most frequent expressed value, reflecting their horizontal perspective. The Chinese subjects, in contrast, rely strongly on a traditional vertical value system to resolve the ethical dilemma. Although both American and Chinese negotiators show a collectivist as well as an individualist. orientation, their focuses are fundamentally different. Originality/value - The well-established collectivism/individualism cultural dimension has been heavily used in cross-cultural studies, sometimes without much discretion. This study was undertaken as a preliminary attempt to outline the cultural patterns observed among young managers in America and China. The paper argues that cross-cultural differences underlying ethical conflicts should not be reduced to the single value dimension of individualism/collectivism.

Exploring subcultural differences in hofstede's value survey: The case of the Chinese

Cultural Differences in Opportunity Cost Consideration.

Hofstede's Culture Dimensions

Measuring Cross-Cultural Differences of Ethnic Groups within Nations: Convergence or Divergence of Cultural Values? The Case of the United States

Comparative Study of Cultural Value Orientation between China and America

Cross-Cultural analysis of Managerial and Cultural Values in Russia and China

A cross-cultural investigation of work values among young executives in China and the USA

Culture Value, Consumer Perceived Value and Purchase Decision Style: Comparison of Chinese Urban Differences

Study on the Difference between China and the U.S.Indicator System from Cultural Background

The Cultural Dimensions of Hofstede in the Chinese Company Zhe Jiang Deman

On the Differences Between Chinese and Western Cultures From the Perspective of Cultural Dimension Theory

Measuring Cultural Dimensions: External Validity and Internal Consistency of Hofstede's VSM 2013 Scales

Values and Behavior Among Minorities in Southwest China: A Cross-Cultural Validation of the Refined Value Theory

Validity Problems Comparing Values Across Cultures and Possible Solutions.

Research of Differences in Chinese and Western Thinking in Linguistic and Custom

Are Individual-Level and Country-Level Value Structures Different? Testing Hofstede’s Legacy With the Schwartz Value Survey

An Empirical Study of Classification of Organizational Culture within the Chinese Context

Comparative Analysis of Chinese and Japanese Cultural Values

Valuing Cultural Differences in Behavioral Economics

A Case Study with Hofstede’s Culture: Working Performance of Chinese Expatriates in Dubai

Identifying Contrasting Chinese and Japanese Cultural Values: Implications for Intercultural Youth Education