Abstract:Purpose - The purpose of the study is to investigate what values are now important to young American and Chinese managers, since they profile the direction in which their country is headed. It aims to explore if the ethical values of young executives in different countries are converging to a common global business culture. It also aims to argue that the individualism-collectivism value dimension by itself does not capture the differences between the Chinese and American sample members. The vertical-horizontal dimension, in contrast, seems to better delineate the value orientations among young executives in the two countries. Design/methodology/approach - In this two-phase study, both attitudinal and scenario-based measurements are applied to assess the strength of work value orientations among similar subjects in China and the USA. Findings - In study 1, Chinese respondents score significantly higher on a hierarchical-vertical dimension than do the Americans, although the two groups do not differ significantly on the collectivism-individualism dimension. In study 2, which entails resolving an ethical dilemma, the American subjects apply Egalitarianism as their most frequent expressed value, reflecting their horizontal perspective. The Chinese subjects, in contrast, rely strongly on a traditional vertical value system to resolve the ethical dilemma. Although both American and Chinese negotiators show a collectivist as well as an individualist. orientation, their focuses are fundamentally different. Originality/value - The well-established collectivism/individualism cultural dimension has been heavily used in cross-cultural studies, sometimes without much discretion. This study was undertaken as a preliminary attempt to outline the cultural patterns observed among young managers in America and China. The paper argues that cross-cultural differences underlying ethical conflicts should not be reduced to the single value dimension of individualism/collectivism.

Validity Problems Comparing Values Across Cultures and Possible Solutions.

Testing the Measurement Equivalence of Personality Adjective Items Across Cultures

Cultural Variations in Reasons for Advice Seeking

Measuring Cultural Dimensions: External Validity and Internal Consistency of Hofstede's VSM 2013 Scales

How Alike Are Political Values Measures?: Comparing Measures of Universal Values, Moral Foundations, Cultural Theory, and Cultural Cognition Theory

Measurement Invariance of the Moral Vitalism Scale Across 28 Cultural Groups.

Exploring subcultural differences in hofstede's value survey: The case of the Chinese

Developing Practical Procedures for the Measurement of Personal Values in Cross-Cultural Marketing

Cross-Cultural Differences and Similarities in Human Value Instantiation

Alternative measurement approaches to consumer values: The list of values and the rokeach value survey

Valuing Cultural Differences in Behavioral Economics

Study on the Difference between China and the U.S.Indicator System from Cultural Background

Functional equivalence and validity of religiousness indicators in cross-cultural comparative surveys

Values and Behavior Among Minorities in Southwest China: A Cross-Cultural Validation of the Refined Value Theory

A Comparison of EFL Raters' Essay-Rating Processes across Two Types of Rating Scales.

Extending the Cross-Cultural Validity of the Theory of Basic Human Values with a Different Method of Measurement

Comparative Analysis of Chinese and Japanese Cultural Values

Attitudes Toward Older Adults: A Matter of Cultural Values or Personal Values?

A cross-cultural investigation of work values among young executives in China and the USA

No Lake Wobegon in Beijing? the Impact of Culture on the Perception of Relative Ranking

On Detecting Systematic Measurement Error in Cross-Cultural Research: A Review and Critical Reflection on Equivalence and Invariance Tests