Abstract:Primary research articles from peer‐reviewed journals are often used as teaching tools in undergraduate science courses. With their unique writing style, field specific terminology, and complex topics, students often struggle to comprehend the articles. Educators use a variety of methods to teach students how to improve their comprehension including annotating the articles, asking targeted questions, or providing specific strategies for reading them. However, one aspect often overlooked in student understanding of primary research articles is how the in‐text citation format affects reading comprehension. The purpose of this study was to determine if in‐text citation format in scientific journals affects reading comprehension in undergraduate students enrolled in science courses. We hypothesize that more complex in text citations (e.g. parenthetical “Author, et. al, Year”) will decrease reading comprehension compared to simpler in text citations (e.g. numeric “[1]”). Undergraduate students (n = 30) enrolled in an upper‐division science course were tasked with reading the introductions of two primary research articles with differing in‐text citations in a randomized, cross‐over design. Each article was modified to have numeric or parenthetical, Author‐Year, in‐text citations. Other than style of in‐text citation, the articles were formatted as published. Each student had 6 minutes to read an article with one in‐text citation format, and then 6 minutes to take a quiz to determine his or her understanding of the article. Students then had 6 minutes to read the second article with the other in‐text citation format followed by 6 minutes to take its quiz. Following the readings and quizzes, students completed a questionnaire that asked about basic demographic information, perceived understanding of the article, and difficulty of reading the article. Student reading comprehension as assessed by post‐reading quizzes was 34% higher when reading articles with numeric in‐text citations compared to articles with parenthetical, Author‐Year, in‐text citations (p = 0.03). The difference in reading comprehension was most pronounced in articles that students perceived as more difficult to read and understand regardless of in‐text citation format. Students performed 70% worse when reading difficult articles with Author‐Year in‐text citations compared to numeric citations (p = 0.01). These results highlight the importance of seemingly minor formatting decisions by editors and journals on reader understanding. Educators should consider providing undergraduate students with primary research articles with modified, simpler, in‐text citations to improve their reading comprehension.

When less is more: Meaningful learning from visual and verbal summaries of science textbook lessons.

Pinch Hitter: The Effectiveness of Content Summaries Delivered by a Guest Lecturer in Online Course Videos

Generative learning activities for online multimedia learning: when summarizing is effective but drawing is not

Effects of Explaining a Science Lesson to Others or to Oneself: A Cognitive Neuroscience Approach

Improving text recall with multiple summaries

Picture This: Studying the Effectiveness of Illustrated Instructions

Learning Via Video: the Effects of Summarizing Strategies and Self-Explanation Prompts

Applying the Science of Learning to the M edical Education

The promise of multimedia learning: using the same instructional design methods across different media

Benefits of prompting students to generate summaries during pauses in segmented multimedia lessons

Using the Summarizing Strategy to Engage Learners: Empirical Evidence in an Immersive Virtual Reality Environment

Less is More: Summary of Long Instructions is Better for Program Synthesis

Engaging Learners by Tracing and Summarizing in a Computer-Based Environment

Textual borrowing in science summaries: upper-elementary and middle school students learning to write the language of science

There's more to the multimedia effect than meets the eye: is seeing pictures believing?

Instructional Visualizations, Cognitive Load Theory, and Visuospatial Processing

Learning by drawing: When is it worth the time and effort?

Teaching for understanding in medical classrooms using multimedia design principles

Effects of Illustrations on Retention and Visual Attention Using Authentic Textbooks

Citation Format Matters: Undergraduate Student Comprehension of Peer‐Reviewed Scientific Manuscripts

Know Your Audience: The benefits and pitfalls of generating plain language summaries beyond the "general" audience