Abstract:In online education, the appropriate choice of means of knowledge visualization can reduce cognitive load and improve cognitive efficiency. However, no universal basis for selection can cause confusion in the pedagogical context. This study used the revised Bloom's taxonomy to combine the types of knowledge with cognitive goals. We used a course on marketing research as an example to summarize the choices for visualizing factual knowledge (FK), conceptual knowledge (CK), procedural knowledge (PK), and metacognitive knowledge (MK) through four experiments. Visualized cognitive stages were used to determine the cognitive efficiencies of visualization for different knowledge types. In this stage, eye tracking is used for collecting eye movement indicators to measure cognitive load. The cognitive goals stage is used to get cognitive goals of the means of knowledge visualization. Combining the two stages, we get the conclusions as follows: Teachers and students can mostly benefit from presenting FK and CK points via mind maps. Using mind maps to teach FK online could be indirectly beneficial for improving students' creativity. Concept maps may be chosen for this point if the linked knowledge points are PK and the achievement of the analytical objective is emphasized in the student's knowledge points. The flowchart can be used to display PK, while timelines could be utilized if the PK point is to be presented in a temporal dimension. Teachers should choose the curve area chart to display MK. A pie chart might be chosen and added more instructions. The findings suggest that mind maps are very effective as a means of knowledge visualization in online education. In the meantime, it suggests that overly simplistic graphs increase cognitive load, while it also raises the possibility that redundant information in the text may increase cognitive load.

Effects of instructor-provided visuals on learner-generated explanations

Picture This: Studying the Effectiveness of Illustrated Instructions

Fostering generative learning from video lessons: Benefits of instructor-generated drawings and learner-generated explanations.

Effects of Explaining a Science Lesson to Others or to Oneself: A Cognitive Neuroscience Approach

Learning by drawing: When is it worth the time and effort?

Instructional Visualizations, Cognitive Load Theory, and Visuospatial Processing

Effects of Illustrations on Retention and Visual Attention Using Authentic Textbooks

Cognitive load and instructionally supported learning with provided and learner-generated visualizations

The effects of visuals versus no visuals on learning outcomes from interactive multimedia instruction

Student Perceptions of the Instructional Effectiveness of Black & White and Colored Illustrations

Choosing optimal means of knowledge visualization based on eye tracking for online education

Interactive and non-interactive pictures in multimedia learning environments: Effects on learning outcomes and learning efficiency

Learner-generated explanations: effects on restudying and learning from a multimedia lesson

Effects of student-generated drawing and imagination on science text reading in a computer-based learning environment

Do illustrations help or harm metacomprehension accuracy?

Effectiveness of Undergraduate-Generated Animations: Increasing Comprehension and Engagement for Neuroscience Majors and Non-Majors

Successful learning with whiteboard animations - A question of their procedural character or narrative embedding?

Concrete and abstract visualizations in history learning tasks

A comparison of animated versus static images in an instructional multimedia presentation

Students’ Comprehension of Science ConceptsDepicted in Textbook Illustrations

Evaluating the educational impact of visualization