Abstract:Abstract When students solve problems on the Internet, they have to find a balance between quickly scanning large sections of information in web pages and deeply processing those that are relevant for the task. We studied how high school students articulate scanning and deeper processing of information while answering questions using a Wikipedia document, and how their reading comprehension skills and the question type interact with these processes. By analyzing retrospective think‐aloud protocols and eye‐tracking measures, we found that scanning of information led to poor hypertext comprehension, while deep processing of information produced better performance, especially in location questions. This relationship between scanning, deep processing, and performance was qualified by reading comprehension skills in an unexpected way: Scanning led to lower performance especially for good comprehenders, while the positive effect of deep processing was independent of reading comprehension skills. We discussed the results in light of our current knowledge of Internet problem solving.Lay Description What is already known about this topic:topic: Students with good reading comprehension skills can identify and deeply process hypertext sections relevant for their goal more efficiently than poor comprehenders. Poor comprehenders tend to quickly scan hypertext sections without noticing the relevant information they encounter. What this paper adds: Scanning relevant hypertext sections is related to lower performance, especially for good comprehenders. Deep processing of relevant hypertext sections is positively related to better performance, independent of reading comprehension skills. Implications for practice and/or policy: All students, independent of their reading comprehension skills, must be taught not to overuse scanning of hypertext sections. Another beneficial strategy is to use contextual cues (e.g., section headings) to predict relevance of a hypertext section.

Improving text recall with multiple summaries

An Investigation of Salient Information in Textual Summarization

When less is more: Meaningful learning from visual and verbal summaries of science textbook lessons.

Pinch Hitter: The Effectiveness of Content Summaries Delivered by a Guest Lecturer in Online Course Videos

How to Evaluate a Summarizer: Study Design and Statistical Analysis for Manual Linguistic Quality Evaluation

Scanning and deep processing of information in hypertext: an eye tracking and cued retrospective think-aloud study

Second language reading and recall processes under different reading purposes: an eye-tracking, keystroke-logging, and stimulated recall study

An Exploration of Post-Editing Effectiveness in Text Summarization

Reducing Quantity Hallucinations in Abstractive Summarization

The Effect of the Multi-Layer Text Summarization Model on the Efficiency and Relevancy of the Vector Space-based Information Retrieval

QuOTeS: Query-Oriented Technical Summarization

Quick Summary

On the Trade-off between Redundancy and Local Coherence in Summarization

Reading multiple documents on a health-related issue: the roles of a text-highlighting tool and re-reading behaviour in integrated understanding

The effects of question previewing on response accuracy and text processing: An eye-movement study

Comparative Analysis of Semantic and Syntactic Approaches in Automatic Text Summarization: A Comprehensive Review and Evaluation

MQAG: Multiple-choice Question Answering and Generation for Assessing Information Consistency in Summarization

Lexical Repetitions Lead to Rote Learning: Unveiling the Impact of Lexical Overlap in Train and Test Reference Summaries

Incorporating Question Answering-Based Signals into Abstractive Summarization via Salient Span Selection

Does This Summary Answer My Question? Modeling Query-Focused Summary Readers with Rational Speech Acts

Deconstructing Summary Writing: Further Exploration of L2 Reading and Writing