How does background knowledge affect second language reading? An eye movement study
Na An,Clare Wright,Jun Wang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12601
2024-08-09
International Journal of Applied Linguistics
Abstract:There is broad consensus that a reader's background knowledge on a reading topic affects both their reading processes and comprehension in their first language and also in a second language. However, it is unclear whether a reader's background knowledge specifically affects reading comprehension accuracy and reading rate. The extent to which background knowledge facilitates second language reading when compared to a reader's L2 linguistic knowledge is also unclear. Moreover, the mental process accounting for the interaction between general background knowledge, type of linguistic knowledge such as vocabulary or writing system, and L2 reading abilities also need to be identified. Using texts in Mandarin Chinese, this paper investigates these problems with an eye‐movement study administered to 40 L2 Chinese learners with Indo‐European L1s. Results illustrate that an L2 reader's background knowledge about the text can positively impact both their reading comprehension and reading rate; however, the influence on the latter could be topic‐dependent. In more challenging topics, the contribution of background knowledge to reading comprehension could outweigh any single type of linguistic knowledge, even if the target language uses a more cognitively demanding writing system. The connectionist account proposed by the construction–integration theory is suggested to be currently the best theoretical explanation for the mental process behind developing second‐language reading abilities. Pedagogical implications are also considered based on these findings. 摘要 现有的研究普遍认为, 读者对阅读主题的背景知识不仅会影响他们在母语中的阅读过程和理解, 同样也会影响他们在第二语言中的阅读过程和理解。然而, 读者的背景知识是否具体影响阅读理解的准确性和阅读速度尚有待研究。读者的背景知识和第二语言语言知识在促进第二语言阅读时的相对权重也缺乏明确结论。此外, 普遍的背景知识、词汇/文字等语言知识以及第二语言阅读能力之间相互作用的心理机制也缺乏理论诠释。本文通过对40名母语为印欧语系的第二语言中文学习者进行的眼动研究, 调查了这些问题。结果表明, 第二语言读者关于文本的背景知识对于他们的阅读理解和阅读速度有正面影响;然而, 对后者的影响可能取决于不同主题。在更有难度的主题中, 背景知识对阅读理解的贡献可能超过任何单一类型的语言知识, 即使目标语言使用了认知负担更大的文字系统(汉语)。根据建构‐整合理论提出的连接主义框架, 可能是目前对上述问题的最佳理论解释。基于这些发现, 本文还探讨了教学方面的启示。
education & educational research,linguistics