Abstract:Motivation: Virtual screening of molecular compound libraries is a potentially powerful and inexpensive method for the discovery of novel lead compounds for drug development. The major weakness of virtual screening-the inability to consistently identify true positives (leads)-is likely due to our incomplete understanding of the chemistry involved in ligand binding and the subsequently imprecise scoring algorithms. It has been demonstrated that combining multiple scoring functions (consensus scoring) improves the enrichment of true positives. Previous efforts at consensus scoring have largely focused on empirical results, but they have yet to provide a theoretical analysis that gives insight into real features of combinations and data fusion for virtual screening. Results: We demonstrate that combining multiple scoring functions improves the enrichment of true positives only if (a) each of the individual scoring functions has relatively high performance and (b) the individual scoring functions are distinctive. Notably, these two prediction variables are previously established criteria for the performance of data fusion approaches using either rank or score combinations. This work, thus, establishes a potential theoretical basis for the probable success of data fusion approaches to improve yields in in silico screening experiments. Furthermore, it is similarly established that the second criterion (b) can, in at least some cases, be functionally defined as the area between the rank versus score plots generated by the two (or more) algorithms. Because rank-score plots are independent of the performance of the individual scoring function, this establishes a second theoretically defined approach to determining the likely success of combining data from different predictive algorithms. This approach is, thus, useful in practical settings in the virtual screening process when the performance of at least two individual scoring functions (such as in criterion a) can be estimated as having a high likelihood of having high performance, even if no training sets are available. We provide initial validation of this theoretical approach using data from five scoring systems with two evolutionary docking algorithms on four targets, thymidine kinase, human dihydrofolate reductase, and estrogen receptors of antagonists and agonists. Our procedure is computationally efficient, able to adapt to different situations, and scalable to a large number of compounds as well as to a greater number of combinations. Results of the experiment show a fairly significant improvement (vs single algorithms) in several measures of scoring quality, specifically "goodness-of-hit" scores, false positive rates, and "enrichment". This approach (available online at http://gemdock.life. nctu.edu.tw/dock/download.php) has practical utility for cases where the basic tools are known or believed to be generally applicable, but where specific training sets are absent.

Noise Reduction Method for Molecular Interaction Energy: Application to in Silico Drug Screening and in Silico Target Protein Screening

The Interprotein Scoring Noises in Glide Docking Scores

Similarities among receptor pockets and among compounds: analysis and application to in silico ligand screening

Multiple target screening method for robust and accurate in silico ligand screening

The Impact of Software Used and the Type of Target Protein on Molecular Docking Accuracy

Bioinformatics Algorithms for Molecular Docking: IT and Chemistry Synergy

Combining Machine Learning Systems and Multiple Docking Simulation Packages to Improve Docking Prediction Reliability for Network Pharmacology

Progress in molecular docking

Deep learning integration of molecular and interactome data for protein–compound interaction prediction

MetaDOCK: A Combinatorial Molecular Docking Approach

Consensus scoring criteria for improving enrichment in virtual screening

Inclusion of Desolvation Energy into Protein–Protein Docking through Atomic Contact Potentials

Compact assessment of molecular surface complementarities enhances neural network-aided prediction of key binding residues

Use of Molecular Docking as a Decision-Making Tool in Drug Discovery

Virtual Ligand Screening against Escherichia coli Dihydrofolate Reductase: Improving Docking Enrichment Using Physics-Based Methods

How Well Does the Extended Linear Interaction Energy Method Perform in Accurate Binding Free Energy Calculations?

ET‐score: Improving Protein‐ligand Binding Affinity Prediction Based on Distance‐weighted Interatomic Contact Features Using Extremely Randomized Trees Algorithm

Integrating Quantum Mechanics into Protein-Ligand Docking: Toward Higher Accuracy and Reliability

Improving Docking-Based Virtual Screening Ability by Integrating Multiple Energy Auxiliary Terms from Molecular Docking Scoring.

Docking Score ML: Target-Specific Machine Learning Models Improving Docking-Based Virtual Screening in 155 Targets

Improving the Performance of Screening MM/PBSA in Protein-Ligand Interactions via Machine Learning