Abstract:Target fishing often relies on the use of reverse docking to identify potential target proteins of ligands from protein database. The limitation of reverse docking is the accuracy of current scoring funtions used to distinguish true target from non-target proteins. Many contemporary scoring functions are designed for the virtual screening of small molecules without special optimization for reverse docking, which would be easily influenced by the properties of protein pockets, resulting in scoring bias to the proteins with certain properties. This bias would cause lots of false positives in reverse docking, interferring the identification of true targets. In this paper, we have conducted a large-scale reverse docking (5000 molecules to 100 proteins) to study the scoring bias in reverse docking by DOCK, Glide, and AutoDock Vina. And we found that there were actually some frequency hits, namely interference proteins in all three docking procedures. After analyzing the differences of pocket properties between these interference proteins and the others, we speculated that the interference proteins have larger contact area (related to the size and shape of protein pockets) with ligands (for all three docking programs) or higher hydrophobicity (for Glide), which could be the causes of scoring bias. Then we applied the score normalization method to eliminate this scoring bias, which was effective to make docking score more balanced between different proteins in the reverse docking of benchmark dataset. Later, the Astex Diver Set was utilized to validate the effect of score normalization on actual cases of reverse docking, showing that the accuracy of target prediction significantly increased by 21.5% in the reverse docking by Glide after score normalization, though there was no obvious change in the reverse docking by DOCK and AutoDock Vina. Our results demonstrate the effectiveness of score normalization to eliminate the scoring bias and improve the accuracy of target prediction in reverse docking. Moreover, the properties of protein pockets causing scoring bias to certain proteins we found here can provide the theory basis to further optimize the scoring functions of docking programs for future research.

The Interprotein Scoring Noises in Glide Docking Scores

Optimization of Molecular Docking Scores with Support Vector Rank Regression

The Scoring Bias in Reverse Docking and the Score Normalization Strategy to Improve Success Rate of Target Fishing.

Evaluating reverse docking on general and selective inhibitors: a case study about glide

Progress in the Scoring Functions of Protein-Protein Docking

Improved Docking of Polypeptides with Glide

Comprehensive evaluation of ten docking programs on a diverse set of protein-ligand complexes: the prediction accuracy of sampling power and scoring power.

Accuracy Assessment of Protein-Based Docking Programs Against RNA Targets

Protein-Protein Docking with Binding Site Patch Prediction and Network-Based Terms Enhanced Combinatorial Scoring

Multiple ligand docking by Glide: implications for virtual second-site screening

Enhance the Performance of Current Scoring Functions with the Aid of 3D Protein-Ligand Interaction Fingerprints.

On Evaluating Molecular-Docking Methods for Pose Prediction and Enrichment Factors

Assessment of scoring functions for computational models of protein-protein interfaces

Rapid Design of Knowledge-Based Scoring Potentials for Enrichment of Near-Native Geometries in Protein-Protein Docking

Improving protein–ligand docking and screening accuracies by incorporating a scoring function correction term

Docking Challenge: Protein Sampling and Molecular Docking Performance

DOX: A New Computational Protocol for Accurate Prediction of the Protein-Ligand Binding Structures.

The role of binding entropy in the refinement of protein-ligand docking predictions: analysis based on the use of 11 scoring functions

Docking Score ML: Target-Specific Machine Learning Models Improving Docking-Based Virtual Screening in 155 Targets

True Accuracy of Fast Scoring Functions to Predict High-Throughput Screening Data from Docking Poses: The Simpler the Better

Evaluation of the Performance of Four Molecular Docking Programs on A Diverse Set of Protein-Ligand Complexes