Abstract:This Article explores the relationship between two key areas of farming regulation: food safety and environmental protection. Focusing on the 2010 Food Safety Modernization Act, which directs the Federal Food and Drug Administration to promulgate rules governing produce safety on farms, this Article identifies a number of tradeoffs between these two areas. Many of these tradeoffs are not immediately apparent on the face of the Food Safety Modernization Act or its implementing rules and arise only as a result of farmers’ particular implementation choices. Like other agriculture regulation, the Food Safety Modernization Act relies on cooperative governance, allowing regulated entities to play a major role in the regulatory process. Thus, many details of the regulatory scheme are determined only after rulemaking is over. Unfortunately, most of the existing administrative law tools that manage tradeoffs between various regulatory goals — for example, cost-benefit analysis and interagency consultation — focus on the rulemaking process itself, and, as such, are poorly suited to address the tradeoffs that inevitably are made in the post-rulemaking implementation phase. There is therefore a mismatch between most risk tradeoff analysis tools — which are aimed at improving the decision-making of agencies during rulemaking — and agricultural cooperative governance schemes, which ultimately delegate tradeoff analysis to farmers to conduct during rule implementation. As a result, regulated entities engage in tradeoff analysis without adequate oversight or accountability. Because farmers are likely to be biased in favor of food safety and against environmental protection, the former is likely to win out regardless of whether the outcome is in the public interest. This Article calls for development of a systematic analytical tool to manage regulatory tradeoffs during rule implementation.

Co-regulation as a possible model for food safety governance: Opportunities for public–private partnerships

Co-regulation as a possible model for food safety governance: Opportunities for public–private partnerships

Risk-based approaches to food safety regulation: what role for co-regulation?

Food safety regulatory systems in Europe and China: A study of how co-regulation can improve regulatory effectiveness

Interregional Collaboration for Food Safety Governance: the Scheme Design and Performance Evaluation with Cases in China

Transnational Business Governance Interactions in Food Safety Regulation: Exploring the Promises and Risks of Enrolment

Public Private Partnerships in food industries: A road to success?

From punishment to prevention: A French case study of the introduction of co-regulation in enforcing food safety

Regulating Farming: Balancing Food Safety and Environmental Protection in a Cooperative Governance Regime

Efficiency of public-private co-regulation in the food sector: the French voluntary agreements for nutritional improvements

Mobilizing Risk: Explaining Policy Transfer in Food and Occupational Safety Regulation in the UK

From Administrative Regulation to Joint Social Governance:Institutional Breakthrough in Food Safety Regulation——Based on Network Analysis

Psychological Capital in Food Safety Social Co-governance

Co‐operation or coercion? Supplier networks and relationships in the UK food industry

Food safety risk behavior and social Co-governance in the food supply chain

A Study on Food Safety:the View of Polycentric-cooperative Governance Theory

Food Safety Governance and Guardianship: The Role of the Private Sector in Addressing the EU Ethylene Oxide Incident

Understanding Complex Governance Relationships in Food Safety Regulation

The use of private regulatory measures to create healthy food retail environments – a scoping review