Abstract:This Article explores the relationship between two key areas of farming regulation: food safety and environmental protection. Focusing on the 2010 Food Safety Modernization Act, which directs the Federal Food and Drug Administration to promulgate rules governing produce safety on farms, this Article identifies a number of tradeoffs between these two areas. Many of these tradeoffs are not immediately apparent on the face of the Food Safety Modernization Act or its implementing rules and arise only as a result of farmers’ particular implementation choices. Like other agriculture regulation, the Food Safety Modernization Act relies on cooperative governance, allowing regulated entities to play a major role in the regulatory process. Thus, many details of the regulatory scheme are determined only after rulemaking is over. Unfortunately, most of the existing administrative law tools that manage tradeoffs between various regulatory goals — for example, cost-benefit analysis and interagency consultation — focus on the rulemaking process itself, and, as such, are poorly suited to address the tradeoffs that inevitably are made in the post-rulemaking implementation phase. There is therefore a mismatch between most risk tradeoff analysis tools — which are aimed at improving the decision-making of agencies during rulemaking — and agricultural cooperative governance schemes, which ultimately delegate tradeoff analysis to farmers to conduct during rule implementation. As a result, regulated entities engage in tradeoff analysis without adequate oversight or accountability. Because farmers are likely to be biased in favor of food safety and against environmental protection, the former is likely to win out regardless of whether the outcome is in the public interest. This Article calls for development of a systematic analytical tool to manage regulatory tradeoffs during rule implementation.

From punishment to prevention: A French case study of the introduction of co-regulation in enforcing food safety

From punishment to prevention: A French case study of the introduction of co-regulation in enforcing food safety

Food Safety Regulatory Enforcement in China: A Data-Driven Approach

Co-regulation as a possible model for food safety governance: Opportunities for public–private partnerships

Direct Intervention or Indirect Support? the Effects of Cooperative Control Measures on Farmers’ Implementation of Quality and Safety Standards

Public Private Partnerships in food industries: A road to success?

Risk-based approaches to food safety regulation: what role for co-regulation?

Efficiency of public-private co-regulation in the food sector: the French voluntary agreements for nutritional improvements

Understanding Farmer Cooperatives' Self-Inspection Behavior to Guarantee Agri-Product Safety in China

Interregional Collaboration for Food Safety Governance: the Scheme Design and Performance Evaluation with Cases in China

Understanding Farmer Cooperatives’ Self-Inspection Behavior to Guarantee Agri-Product Safety in China

Improving Vegetable Safety in China: Does Co-Regulation Work?

Transnational Business Governance Interactions in Food Safety Regulation: Exploring the Promises and Risks of Enrolment

Food safety regulatory systems in Europe and China: A study of how co-regulation can improve regulatory effectiveness

Mobilizing Risk: Explaining Policy Transfer in Food and Occupational Safety Regulation in the UK

Democratising Food Safety: Why We Need to Look Beyond Government Regulation and Provide a Citizen Right of Action

Public Health and Pesticide Regulation in France Before and After Silent Spring

Secrecies as Organized Ignorance: The Illusion of Knowledge in French Pesticide Regulation

Regulating Farming: Balancing Food Safety and Environmental Protection in a Cooperative Governance Regime