Abstract:Background: Pre-operative radiographic assessment of the anatomical relationship between the roots of the mandibular third molar and the inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) is a must to minimize the risk of IAN injury during surgery. Objectives: To compare the radiographic signs of digital orthopantomogram (OPG) and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). An additional objective was to assess the cortex status between the mandibular canal and third molar on CBCT images in relation to the demographic characteristics, region (right or left side), and angulation of mandibular molar. Methodology: In this retrospective study, a total of 350 impacted mandibular third molars with a close relationship between the inferior alveolar canal (IAC) and impacted mandibular third molars on digital OPG were further referred for CBCT imaging for assessment of the position of the mandibular canal. The study was conducted between August 2018 and February 2020. Digital OPGs were evaluated for radiographic signs like interruption of the mandibular canal wall, darkening of the roots, diversion of the mandibular canal, and narrowing of the mandibular canal. The age and sex of patients, site of impacted third molar, Winter’s classification of mandibular third molar, position of IAC relative to impacted molar, and the radiographic markers of OPG were assessed for cortical integrity using CBCT. Chi square testing was applied to study the values of difference and binomial logistic regression was done to assess the factors associated with cortication. Statistical significance was set at p ≤ 0.05. Results: Among 350 patients, 207 (59.1%) were male and 143 (40.9%) were female with a mean age of 36.8 years. The most common OPG sign was interruption of white line, seen in 179 (51.1%) cases. In total, 246 cases (70.3%) showed an absence of canal cortication between the mandibular canal and the impacted third molar on CBCT images. Cortication was observed in all cases with a combination of panoramic signs which was statistically significant (p = 0.047). Cortication was observed in 85 (50.6%) cases where IAC was positioned on the buccal side, 11 (16.9%) in cases of inferiorly positioned IAC, and just 8 (7.6%) for cases of lingually positioned IAC which was statistically significant (p = 0.003). Statistically insignificant (p > 0.05) results were noted for cortex status in CBCT images with regards to the age, sex, site, and angulation of impacted third molars. Conclusion: CBCT imaging is highly recommended for those cases where diversion of the mandibular canal is observed on OPG and when the roots are present between canals.

Do anatomical variations of the mandibular canal pose an increased risk of inferior alveolar nerve injury after third molar removal?

Retrospective evaluation of sensory neuropathies after extraction of mandibular third molars with confirmed "high-risk" features on cone beam computed topography scans

Radiographic features of anatomic relationship between impacted third molar and inferior alveolar canal on coronal CBCT images: risk factors for nerve injury after tooth extraction

Radiographic predictors of post-operative inferior alveolar nerve injury in mandibular third molar surgery

Anatomic Study of the Position of the Mandibular Canal and Corresponding Mandibular Third Molar on Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Images

Degree of Compression of the Inferior Alveolar Canal on Cone-Beam Computed Tomography and Outcomes of Postoperative Nerve Injury in Mandibular Third Molar Surgery

Risk Factors Associated with Inferior Alveolar Nerve Injury after Extraction of Impacted Lower Mandibular Third Molars: A Prospective Cohort Study

Evaluating the Risk of Post-Extraction Inferior Alveolar Nerve Injury Through the Relative Position of the Lower Third Molar Root and Inferior Alveolar Canal.

Anatomical relationship between mental foramen, mandibular teeth and risk of nerve injury with endodontic treatment

Endoscopic Visualization of the Inferior Alveolar Nerve Associated with Somatosensory Changes after Impacted Mandibular Third Molar Extraction.

Can a panoramic radiograph predict the inferior alveolar nerve canal's position, or canal compression, near third molar root apices?

Anatomic relationship between impacted third mandibular molar and the mandibular canal as the risk factor of inferior alveolar nerve injury.

Evaluating the Risk Factors of Inferior Alveolar Nerve Injury Following Removal of the Mandibular Third Molars

Is Cone Beam Computed Tomography Accurate in Predicting Inferior Alveolar Nerve Exposure During Mandibular Third Molar Extraction?

Radiological evaluation of inferior alveolar nerve displacement after removal of impacted mandibular third molars prior to sagittal split osteotomy

Investigation of the relationship between the mandibular third molar teeth and the inferior alveolar nerve using posteroanterior radiographs: a pilot study

Risk assessment of inferior alveolar nerve injury after wisdom tooth removal using 3D AI-driven models: A within-patient study

[Impacted third molar root abnormality with mandibular canal close position as a presupposing factor to inferior alveolar nerve trauma]

Comparison of Digital OPG and CBCT in Assessment of Risk Factors Associated with Inferior Nerve Injury during Mandibular Third Molar Surgery

Identifying the Anatomical Variations of the Inferior Alveolar Nerve with Magnetic Resonance Imaging

A CBCT Based Three-Dimensional Assessment of Mandibular Posterior Region for Evaluating the Possibility of Bypassing the Inferior Alveolar Nerve While Placing Dental Implants.