Bone regeneration using Wollastonite/β-TCP scaffolds implants in critical bone defect in rat calvaria

George Gonçalves dos Santos,Izamir Resende Júnior Borges Miguel,Aryon de Almeida Barbosa,Willams Teles Barbosa,Katilayne Vieira de Almeida,Raúl García-Carrodeguas,Marcus Lia Fook,Miguel A Rodríguez,Fúlvio Borges Miguel,Roberto Paulo Correia de Araújo,Fabiana Paim Rosa,Aryon de Almeida Barbosa Junior
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/2057-1976/ac1878
2021-08-06
Abstract:In order to provide favorable conditions for bone regeneration, a lot of biomaterials have been developed and evaluated, worldwide. Composite biomaterials have gained notoriety, as they combine desirable properties of each isolated material. Thus, in this research, bone repair capacity of three developed formulations of ceramic scaffolds were evaluated histomorphometrically, after implantation. Scaffolds were based on wollastonite (W) and β-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP) composites in three different ratios (wt.%). Thirty Wistar rats were randomly assigned to three experimental groups: W-20 (20 W/80β-TCP wt.%), W-60 (60 W/40β-TCP wt.%), and W-80 (80 W/20β-TCP wt.%), evaluated by optical microscopy at biological tests after 15 and 45 days of implantation. Throughout the study, the histological results evidenced that the scaffolds remained at the implantation site, were biocompatible and presented osteogenic potential. The percentage of neoformed mineralized tissue was more evident in the W-20 group (51%), at 45 days. The composite of the W-80 group showed more evident biodegradation than the biomaterials of the W-20 and W-60 groups. Thus, it is concluded that the scaffold containing 20 W/80β-TCP (wt.%) promoted more evident bone formation, but all composites evaluated in this study showed notorious bioactivity and promising characteristics for clinical application.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?