Histomorphological and histomorphometric analysis of wollastonite and tricalcium phosphate composite at different concentrations after in vivo implantation

Luisa Queiroz Vasconcelos,Mauricio Mitsuo Monção,Aryon de Almeida Barbosa Júnior,Raúl Garcia Carrodeguas,Isabela Cerqueira Barreto,Roberto Paulo Correia De Araújo
DOI: https://doi.org/10.34117/bjdv9n1-363
2023-01-26
Brazilian Journal of Development
Abstract:Purpose: To evaluate, through histomorphometric analysis in critical bone defect, the osteogenic behavior of new glass-ceramic biomaterials in granules, named different from pseudowollastonite (p-W) and beta tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP). Methods: Forty Wistar rats were randomly distributed into 4 groups, with 5 animals in each group recovered at 15 and 45 days: G20/80 (20% p-wollastonite and 80% β-tricalcium phosphate); G60/40 (60% p-W and 40% β-TCP); G80/20 (80% p-W and 20% β-TCP); and CG (control group). Results: A histomorphological analysis showed that, in all rules, the composites were biocompatible and bioactive. The G60/40 presents osteoid matrix deposition in 65% of the bone defect at 45 days. While the other groups formed similar percentages of bone neoformation in both biological points. Conclusion: The studied composites are biocompatible, fillers and osteoconductive.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?