Abstract:Introduction: is China a neo-liberal state in the making? Few people would deny that China's economic miracle is consistent with its continuing integration into the world economy. According to a survey in The Economist (Ziegler 2000: 20), economic growth in China averaged nearly 8 per cent a year from 1979, and exports grew by 15 per cent and imports by 13 per cent a year between 1979 and 1999 - 'a faster rate of growth than Japan managed during its golden period in 1953-73'. China became the tenth-biggest exporter in the world in the mid-1990s, and the amount of foreign direct investment (FDI) it received in recent years is exceeded only by that of the United States (US). 2 Nicholas Lardy (1994: 110), a US expert on China's foreign economic relations, notes that in many respects, 'China is already somewhat more integrated into the world economy than Japan, Taiwan, or South Korea were at comparable stages of their economic development'. As China just entered the World Trade Organisation (WTO), the Chinese economy is set to become even more integrated into the world market.3 Given China's two-decade experience of rapid growth and increasing openness, it seems a good test case for the main theme of this book: the role of domestic institutions in an era of intensifying economic interdependence. Thomas Moore (1996) argues that there is a 'global' logic behind China's economic opening. That is, the changing nature of economic activity in China is a function of its position in the international division of labour rather than a function of state intervention. A neo-liberal view would further suggest that globalisation leads to a decline of state power and a triumph of market forces. Hence, a successful state in the present era of globalisation would be a neo-liberal state, which plays a minimum role in the domestic economy. However, as Linda Weiss (1999b: 127) has argued, 'global and national are not necessarily competing principles of organisation, they can be - and indeed in many ways already are - complementary'. She

Institutional change and globalization

Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies

Globalization and Its Countermovement: Marxian Contention or Polanyian Resistance?

The trajectory of institutional change in Germany, 1979–2009

Globalization versus the state: false antinomy or logical fallacy? A response to Clyde W. Barrow and Michelle Keck

Debate on the New Global Capitalism: Transnational Capitalist Class, Transnational State Apparatuses, and Global Crisis

"Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity" in the Era of Polycrisis: Institutionalist Economics beyond the t/T Duality

Institutional and Policy Change: Meta-theory and Method

Dynamics of formal and informal institutional change in the EU

The Global Orientation of Organizations: An Analysis of the Effects of Global Cultural Rationalization and National Institutional Traditions

Introduction: Globalisation and Transnational Uncivil Society

Economic History and Contemporary Challenges to Globalization

International regimes, transactions, and change: embedded liberalism in the postwar economic order

Globalization and why the ‘time is ripe’ for the transformation of German industrial relations

The Backlash of Globalization

Institutionalism and New Trade Theory: Rethinking Comparative Advantage and Trade Policy

The three institutionalisms and institutional dynamics: understanding endogenous and exogenous change

States in the Global Economy: Bringing Domestic Institutions Back In edited by Linda Weiss (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003). Chapter Seven Building Institutional Capacity for China's New Economic Opening

Debates between the American School and the British School on International Political Economy:Academic Culture,Status of National Power,and China Themes

The Diversity and Rapprochement of Theories of Institutional Change: Original Institutionalism and New Institutional Economics

Globalization and the Critique of Political Economy: New Insights from Marxʼs Writings