Abstract:Abstract Tremendous changes have occurred in China–US relations since Donald J. Trump took office in the White House, but the most significant event is the outbreak of the China–US trade war, whose unprecedented scale and impact has drawn wide attention in China and sparked considerable debate. This article aims to review the four main stages of this great debate on the China–US trade war among China’s influential intellectuals and prominent thinkers. It covers the three-year period since beginning of the Trump administration. The initial argument among Chinese academics was whether or not there could ever be a trade war, which led to a dividing line between optimists and pessimists. Soon after, when China-US relations took a sharp downturn and a trade war seemed inevitable, Chinese scholars shifted their focus to reasons why the United States should wage a trade war against China. This culminated in three different perspectives embodied respectively in the structural conflict theory, institutional conflict theory, and the theory on exporting domestic problems. After China and the United States began slapping additional tariffs on one another’s exported goods, and with the flare-up of the Zhongxing Telecommunication Equipment Corporation (ZTE) and Huawei incidents, the debate on how to respond to a trade war cleaved between the ‘whole nation system school’ and the ‘market reform school’. As to coping with the technology war, Chinese intellectuals were divided between the paths of ‘independent innovation’ and ‘open innovation’. More recently, in view of the many signs that the China–US trade war could continue indefinitely, and an economic decoupling of the two nations is no longer unimaginable, a fierce debate has arisen between those that advocate full preparations for such economic decoupling and those who insist on further links with the US economy. Although the main themes of the four stages of the debate differ somewhat, they share a certain degree of consistency as regards the conceptual pedigree of the debating parties. Their divergence derives, in essence, from different perspectives on such issues as state power versus market force, independence versus interdependence, and zero-sum competition of power versus win-win economic cooperation. This also exemplifies the competing views in Chinese academia on classical political economy.

Debates between the American School and the British School on International Political Economy:Academic Culture,Status of National Power,and China Themes

Chinese IPE debates on (American) hegemony

The Hypothesis of Cultural Differences in Sino-Us Relation with International Political Conflicts

The English and Chinese Schools of International Relations Comparisons and Lessons

Towards Economic Decoupling? Mapping Chinese Discourse on the China–US Trade War

Eying the Crippled Hegemon: China’s Grand Strategy Thinking in the Wake of the Global Financial Crisis

Whither the English School

Reflections on Economics Education in China and Suggestions for Its Reform

Disputing Chinese Views on Power

China's Trade Relations with the United States in Perspective

China Debating the Regional Order

From Partnership to Rivalry: China and the USA in the Early Twenty-First Century

Learning by Debating. The Changing Role of the State in China's Economy and Economic Theories

Inevitable War, US Decline or Business as Usual? Narratives on China’s Ascension to Power Among American Academia

Debates on Changes in the Foreign Policy of Contemporary China (A Case Study of the English Language Academic Publications)

International Financial Discursive Power and the China Strategy

American Studies:Growth of the discipline and Its Chinese Implications

Individual and collective outcomes of higher education: a comparison of Anglo-American and Chinese approaches

Globalization and International Political Economy:Beyond "Paradigmatic Debates"?

Research on the differences and Countermeasures of Sino U.S. economic and trade negotiations

The Politics and Economics of the US-China Trade War