Abstract:In the last few years, China's foreign policy behaviour has puzzled many observers. While on some occasions the country's leaders and diplomats vow to take the mantle of world leadership from the United States, on others they insist that China is still a developing country and cannot assume more responsibility. Why does China present itself both as a rich rising power and as a poor developing country? Why (and when) does China send contradictory signals to the world? How can China project different images and manage these clashing identities? Xiaoyu Pu's book addresses these puzzles from the perspective of status politics. In the introduction, he argues that while most studies of status politics correctly assume that a rising power like China will act as a status-maximizer and thus signal higher status, they tend to neglect that China also acts as a status-minimizer and thus signals lower status. In the next two chapters, Pu provides a theoretical framework to explain why a rising power such as China signals different statuses. In chapter two, Pu gives a strategy-centred account. A rising power like China often uses three different status-signalling strategies to achieve a wide range of goals: ‘consumption’ (e.g. building aircraft carriers, spaceships or mega-infrastructure projects, or hosting the Olympic Games) to signal the desire for high status; ‘giving’ (e.g. foreign aid or providing public goods) to demonstrate its belonging to a community; and ‘spinning’ (e.g. highlighting weakness or downplaying strength) to signal a lower status, keep a low profile and shirk responsibility (pp. 23–6, 29–32). In chapter three, Pu provides an audience-centred account. China often signals different statuses to ‘multiple audiences’: in front of a domestic audience, it signals higher status to satisfy nationalistic demands and maintain political legitimacy; in front of the West, it signals lower status to free-ride and reassure the dominant state(s); in front of regional audiences, like Asian neighbouring countries, or a global South audience, such as African developing countries, it signals both higher and lower statuses to create a sense of both veneration and friendship. China's status-signalling behaviour, therefore, is explained by the changing combination of the three different strategies used and the four types of audiences targeted.

Disputing Chinese Views on Power

Chinese IPE debates on (American) hegemony

Sources and limits of Chinese ‘soft power’

China’s Rise and Its Discursive Power Strategy

"The Great Powers" Revisited and Implications for China

International Financial Discursive Power and the China Strategy

Rethinking China's Rise: Chinese Scholars Debate Strategic Overstretch

Power, Geo-Setting and Evaluation Method of Geo-Potential:A Case Study of the Dispute over China and Japan on the Diaoyu Islands

A Semantic Analysis of Power Politics

Dragon’s Underbelly: an Analysis of China’s Soft Power

China and Major Power Relations in East Asia

On Power of Discourse of Chinese Management Research

China's “Politics of Harmony” and the Quest for Soft Power in International Politics

On Power Resource As a Dominating Factor

Rebranding China: Contested Status Signaling in the Changing Global Order

A Debating of Power

Dilemma of Balancing: Balance of Powe r and World Politics in the 21~(st) Century

COMPREHENSION OF “GREAT POWER DIPLOMACY WITH CHINESE CHARACTERISTICS”. SIMILARITIES AND DIFFERENCES

China Debating the Regional Order

Debates on Changes in the Foreign Policy of Contemporary China (A Case Study of the English Language Academic Publications)

China and its major power relations