Moral Descriptors and the Assessment of Children

Joan F. Goodman

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0305724980270403

1998-12-01

Journal of Moral Education

Abstract:In the world outside schools, the public clamours for more character education; inside schools, psychologists, responsible for evaluating children, neither assess the moral domain nor use moral terminology to describe children. There are powerful reasons to resist the reintroduction of moral language into psychological assessments: such inclusion could promote invidious labelling, burden children with shame and guilt and open the diagnostic system to increased subjectivity, capriciousness and stigmatization‐‐the substitution of “illness” for what is mere social and cultural difference. Despite these serious objections, it is arguable that the moral domain should be included in our psychological appraisals of children, and that the absence of moral dictates in a child could even be considered a “mental disorder”. If children are endowed with a native moral propensity (as they are endowed with a native attachment propensity), and if that propensity is inadequately nurtured, then the consequent deprivation may compromise healthy mental development. Although officially extending the existing psychiatric diagnostic nomenclature may be an overreaction to the current state of silence, the individual and social yield from including moral descriptors in child evaluations should not be dismissed lightly. These benefits are discussed.

education & educational research