Abstract:Virtual humans are digital characters created in computer graphics software that take a first-person view of the world and have a social media presence. Compared with real humans, however, are people likely to attribute moral responsibility differently to virtual humans when they do something morally wrong? This important empirical question remains unanswered. Therefore, we addressed this query using Mental Perception Theory. We did so through exploring the influence and mechanism of cultural differences between China and the West on individuals' moral responsibility judgments of virtual humans versus real humans. Findings revealed that, when virtual humans engaged in immoral behaviors-irrespective of whether real humans or artificial intelligence (AI) controlled them-people in China (vs. the West) attributed more moral responsibility to virtual humans but equal moral responsibility to real humans. Perceived mental capacity, especially perceived experience, mediated the interaction effect of culture. Furthermore, compared to Westerners, Chinese people were more likely to punish virtual (vs. real) humans, such as by no longer following their social accounts. Five experiments revealed the foregoing findings. Study 1a and 1b used a 2 (blogger: human vs. virtual) x 2 (culture: Chinese vs. Western) between-subjects design. Two hundred Chinese and 200 American Caucasian participants were recruited in Study 1a. They first read the profile of a virtual/human blogger, Rico, on Weibo (i.e., China)/Twitter (i.e., America). Next, they were told that Rico had exposed the private behavior of a netizen, which made that individual suffer from cyber violence. After that, participants rated the moral responsibility of Rico with two items. Consistent with our prediction, there was a significant interaction effect between the Chinese/Western culture and the virtual/human blogger on moral responsibility judgments. Specifically, Chinese (vs. Western) people attributed more moral responsibility to the virtual blogger, but there was no significant difference in moral responsibility judgments toward the human blogger. In Study 1b, we recruited 200 Chinese and 199 British Caucasian participants online. We utilized a similar study design and manipulations to those employed in Study 1a. Study 1b replicated the results of Study 1 with a new scenario (i.e., tax evasion) and new methods of measuring moral responsibility judgments. Study 1c used a 3 ( blogger: human s. virtual-human vs. virtual-AI) x 2 (culture: Chinese vs. Western) between-subjects design. Three hundred Chinese and 300 British Caucasian participants were recruited online. The results showed that Chinese (vs. British) people attributed greater human-like moral responsibility to a virtual human controlled by real humans as well as by artificial intelligence. Study 2 used the same study design as employed in 1b. Two hundred Chinese and 199 American Caucasian participants were recruited online. They read the same profile of the virtual/human blogger Rico and his immoral behavior (i.e., tax evasion). Then, participants rated moral responsibility judgments and mental capacity of Rico. Results revealed the mediating role of perceived mental capacity (i.e., experience, not agency) on the cultural difference of moral responsibility judgments and ruled out two possible alternative explanations. Study 3 used a 2 (culture: Chinese vs. Western) between-subjects design. One hundred Chinese participants and 101 American Caucasian participants were recruited online. This study utilized another scenario (i. e., plagiarism) and replicated the results of the four previous studies. Furthermore, we showed the downstream effect that Chinese (vs. American) people believed that the virtual human should be punished more (i.e., fining, suspending the account, and no longer following the account). In summary, based on Mental Perception Theory, this paper provided evidence for the cultural differences between Chinese people and Westerners on moral responsibility judgments of virtual humans. Perceived mental capacity (i.e., experience, not agency) mediated this interaction effect. In addition, we revealed the downstream results of moral punishment and contributed to literature on cultural differences and the theory about moral judgments on non-human entities.

How people evaluate individuals who act morally prior to acting immorally: An examination of developmental change in moral evaluation, social preference, and prediction of moral behaviors

The Influence of Cultural Differences Between China and the West on Moral Responsibility Judgments of Virtual Humans

When it's not easy to do the right thing: Developmental changes in understanding cost drive evaluations of moral praiseworthiness

Moral Descriptors and the Assessment of Children

The development of intent-based trust in moral testimony

Human infants are aroused and concerned by moral transgressions

Morality in middle childhood: the role of callous-unemotional traits and emotion regulation skills

Moral emotions and the development of the moral self in childhood

Moral Observer-Licensing in Cyberspace

Disagreement, justification, and equitable moral judgments: A brief training study

Pro-Environmental Behavior Triggers Moral Inference, Not Licensing by Observers

Unmasking Moral Hypocrisy: How Preschoolers Perceive and Judge Moral Hypocrites

Assessor Teaching and the Evolution of Human Morality

Does It Look Good or Evil? Children's Recognition of Moral Identities in Illustrations of Characters in Stories

The juvenile delinquent as a moral philosopher: A structural-developmental perpective.

The origins of moral sensitivities: Probing infants' expectations, evaluations, generalization, and enforcement of moral norms

Infants’ and Young Children’s Preferences for Prosocial over Antisocial Others

Preschoolers' social dominance, moral cognition, and moral behavior: an evolutionary perspective

Influences of past moral behavior on future behavior: A review of sequential moral behavior studies using meta-analytic techniques.

What Accounts for Prosocial Behavior? Roles of Moral Identity, Moral Judgment, and Self-Efficacy Beliefs

Assessing social cognition: age-related changes in moral reasoning in childhood and adolescence