The Moral and Conventional Judgment in Autistic Children

Yuan FENG,Yanjie SU
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1007-3728.2005.06.015
2005-01-01
Abstract:Based on Blair's research paradigm, this study added two groups of de-moralized and pan-conventional tasks to examine moral and conventional judgment both in autistic and normal children, to explore the relation between judgment and Theory of Mind (ToM) in two types of children. The results indicated that autistic children got lower scores than normal children with matched PPVT in terms of false believe understanding performance; two groups of children showed differences in moral judgment but had no differences in conventional judgment. It suggested that moral judgment might be relied on ToM development, and conventional judgment relate to training and socialization.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?