Abstract:Background It is essential to measure and assess the parameters of ocular anterior segment for refractive surgery in myopic eyes.Some different imaging devices can be used for biometric measurement of ocular anterior segment,but which is more accurate and convenient is still under investigation.Objective This study was to compare the anterior segment parameters in myopic eyes measured by anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT),Orbscan topography and ultrasonic pachymetry (US).Methods One hundred and forty eyes of 70 myopic subjects with the diopter of-0.75 to-10.25 D,who intended to receive corneal refractive surgery in the Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine from November 2011 to May 2012,were retrospectively analyzed.Central corneal thickness (CCT) was measured using AS-OCT,Orbscan Ⅱ and US,respectively,and anterior chamber depth (ACD) was measured by AS-OCT and Orbscan Ⅱ,and the angle to angle (ATA) distance and corneal white-to-white corneal distance (WTW) were measured by AS-OCT and Orbscan Ⅱ,respectively.The parameters from different apparatuses were statistically compared.Results The mean CCT were (516.57±30.25) μm in AS-OCT,(523.68±31.87) μm in US and (514.69±38.40) μm in Orbscan Ⅱ,without significant difference among them (F =2.775,P =0.063).Then the patients were divided into three groups based on the US measurement of CCT (＜500 μm group,500-569 μm group,and ≥ 570 μm group).In the ＜500 μm group,there was a significant difference in the CCT among the three methods (F =22.236,P =0.000),significant differences were found between AS-OCT and Orbscan Ⅱ,or Orbscan Ⅱ and US(both at P＜0.05).In the 500-569 μm group,there was no significant difference in the CCT among the three methods (F =3.011,P =0.051).In the ≥ 570 μm group,there was a significant difference in the CCT among the three methods (F =4.133,P =0.021),a significant difference was found between AS-OCT and US(P＜0.05),but there was no significant difference between AS-OCT and Orbscan Ⅱ (P＞0.05).The ACD values measured by AS-OCT was (3.83±0.21) mm,which was higher than (3.75 ± 0.21) mm by Orbscan Ⅱ,with a significant difference between them (t =-8.520,P =0.000).In addition,the ATA value by AS-OCT (12.43 mm±0.74 mm) was higher than the WTW value (11.42 mm±0.33 mm) by OrbscanⅡ,with a significant difference between them(t=-18.088,P=0.000).Conclusions AS-OCT,US and Orbscan Ⅱ can offer accurate CCT value,and they can provide references to one another before refractive surgery.However,the ACD,ATA and WTW values by AS-OCT and Orbscan]Ⅱ have large differences.

Central corneal thickness measurement with Pentacam, Orbscan II, and ultrasound devices before and after laser refractive surgery for myopia

Corneal changes after laser refractive surgery for myopia: Comparison of Orbscan II and Pentacam findings

Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness Measured with Orbscan-II,Pentacam and Ultrasonic Pachymetry

Comparison of central corneal thickness measured by non-contact specular microscope or by ultrasound pachymetry

Myopic Laser Corneal Refractive Surgery Reduces Interdevice Agreement in the Measurement of Anterior Corneal Curvature

[Measurement of Central Corneal Thickness in Myopic Eyes with Ultrasound and Pentacam Scheimpflug System].

Comparison of ocular anterior segment parameters measured by three kinds of biometric measuring methods in myopic eyes

Clinical measurement of anterior chamber depth and lens thickness in myopic eyes with ultrasound and pentacam scheinpflug system

Comparison of central corneal thickness treated with small incision lenticule extraction, femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis, or laser-assisted subepithelial keratomileusis for myopia

A Comparison of Corneal Thicknesses Measured Before LASIK by RTVue FD-OCT System and Ultrasonic Pachymetry

Bilateral Comparison of Conventional Versus Topographic-guided Customized Ablation for Myopic LASIK with the NIDEK EC-5000

Comparison of central corneal thickness measured in myopic eyes by Pentacam, Sirius and IOLMaster 700

Evaluation of the Difference Between Predicted and Measured Central Corneal Thickness Reduction after SMILE and Femtosecond Laser-assisted LASIK for Myopia.

Comparison of the biometric measurements obtained using the Lenstar, Pentacam and ultrasound pachymetry methods in cataract patients

Clinical Analysis of Measuring Corneal Thickness with Non-Contact Method

Comparative Study of Central Corneal Thickness Measurement with Slit-Lamp Optical Coherence Tomography and Visante Optical Coherence Tomography

Determining corneal power using Orbscan II videokeratography for intraocular lens calculation after excimer laser surgery for myopia

Agreement between swept-source optical biometry and Scheimpflug-based tomography in eyes with previous myopic refractive surgery

Changes in the Higher Order Ocular Aberrations and Central Corneal Thickness After T-PRK and Fs-LASIK

Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements between anterior segment optical coherence tomography and ultrasonic pachymeter after DSAEK

Comparison of keratometric measurements obtained by the Verion image guided system with the IOLMaster and the Pentacam before cataract extraction surgery