Abstract:In the early 1970s, we and others in the economics profession became enamored with the notion of externalties—a cost or benefit imposed on or provided to others but not taken into account by the economic agents who generate the effect. We, and others, seemed to see external effects everywhere. There was polluted water and air, noise, urban blight, traffic congestion, and other features of modern life that seemed to call out for some form of corrective action. As the externalities revolution unfolded, economists and other social scientists overlooked the importance of evolved legal and other institutions that formally and informally establish property and liability rules that cause decision makers to face the cost of their actions, including what otherwise could be external costs imposed on unwilling third parties. While markets seemed always to fail, political institutions were seen systematically as without blemish, or so it seemed. It was this two-pronged failure, 1) a failure to consider and state assumptions about background institutional arrangements and 2) a disregard for special interest politics, that became the Achilles Heel of the otherwise elegant externality arguments. Eventually, it was the modern institutionalists, scholars who focused on laws, regulation, and rules of the marketplace, who attempted to close the lid and drive the nails on the externality coffin. In this paper, we reach back to 1920 and trace the rise and decline of the policy importance of externalities theory. Beginning with A. C. Pigou and Alfred Marshall, our story includes some of the great figures in economic history of thought. But while theory was being built, institutions were overlooked. Pigou continues to be a dominant player in the story until the 1960s and 1970s when externalities theory was challenged by James M. Buchanan, Ronald Coase and other scholars. It is here in the twilight years of the externalities revolution that the prospects of government failure are raised as being more daunting than the likelihood of market failure. Finally, in the late 1970s and beyond, the externalities revolution is replaced by a property rights revolution.

Master of Fate or Victim of Circumstance — The Exercise of Corporate Power in Environmental Policy-Making

The Politics of Market-Based Environmental Regulation: Continuity and Change in Air Pollution Control Policy Conflict

Political Science and the Study of Corporate Power: A Dissent from the New Conventional Wisdom

The Limits of Corporate Social Responsibility: Techniques of Neutralization, Stakeholder Management and Political CSR

Beyond takeovers: politics comes to corporate control

The balancing act of corporate political activity under institutional pressure

THE END OF THE EXTERNALITY REVOLUTION

Towards a Broader Approach to Competition and the Environment: Market Power and Environmental Disasters

CORPORATE SUSTAINABILITY: Accountability and the Pursuit of the Impossible Dream

Impact of consumer power on consumers' reactions to corporate transgression

In Whose Interest? Pressure Group Politics, Economic Competition and Environmental Regulation

Political 'Colour' and Firm Behaviour: Evidence from U.S. Power Plants' Pollution Abatement

The influence of corporate market power on health: exploring the structure-conduct-performance model from a public health perspective

Political Strategies to Overcome Climate Policy Obstructionism

Environment, Energy, Economy

Corporate Characteristics, Political Embeddedness and Environmental Pollution by Large U.S. Corporations

The Radical Flank Revisited: How Regulatory Discretion Shapes the Effectiveness of Social Activism on Business Outcomes

An Analysis of the “Path of Least Resistance” Argument in Three Environmental Justice Success Cases

Legitimating impotence: Pyrrhic victories of the modern environmental movement

Power, discourse, and policy: articulating a hegemony approach to critical policy studies

Taking sides: Corporate social responsibility and political ideology