Abstract:In the early 1970s, we and others in the economics profession became enamored with the notion of externalties—a cost or benefit imposed on or provided to others but not taken into account by the economic agents who generate the effect. We, and others, seemed to see external effects everywhere. There was polluted water and air, noise, urban blight, traffic congestion, and other features of modern life that seemed to call out for some form of corrective action. As the externalities revolution unfolded, economists and other social scientists overlooked the importance of evolved legal and other institutions that formally and informally establish property and liability rules that cause decision makers to face the cost of their actions, including what otherwise could be external costs imposed on unwilling third parties. While markets seemed always to fail, political institutions were seen systematically as without blemish, or so it seemed. It was this two-pronged failure, 1) a failure to consider and state assumptions about background institutional arrangements and 2) a disregard for special interest politics, that became the Achilles Heel of the otherwise elegant externality arguments. Eventually, it was the modern institutionalists, scholars who focused on laws, regulation, and rules of the marketplace, who attempted to close the lid and drive the nails on the externality coffin. In this paper, we reach back to 1920 and trace the rise and decline of the policy importance of externalities theory. Beginning with A. C. Pigou and Alfred Marshall, our story includes some of the great figures in economic history of thought. But while theory was being built, institutions were overlooked. Pigou continues to be a dominant player in the story until the 1960s and 1970s when externalities theory was challenged by James M. Buchanan, Ronald Coase and other scholars. It is here in the twilight years of the externalities revolution that the prospects of government failure are raised as being more daunting than the likelihood of market failure. Finally, in the late 1970s and beyond, the externalities revolution is replaced by a property rights revolution.

In Whose Interest? Pressure Group Politics, Economic Competition and Environmental Regulation

Customer, regulatory, and competitive pressure as drivers of environmental innovation

Environmental Policy with Green Consumerism

The Politics of Market-Based Environmental Regulation: Continuity and Change in Air Pollution Control Policy Conflict

Greening the Economy Through Voluntary Private Sector Initiatives or Government Regulation? A Public Opinion Perspective

Environmental Concerns, Environmental Policy And Green Investment

Protecting whose welfare? A document analysis of competition regulatory decisions in four jurisdictions across three harmful consumer product industries

Impact of Regulatory Intervention and Consumer Environmental Concern on Product Introduction

Regulatory pressure and consumer environmental awareness in a green supply chain with retailer responsibility: A dynamic analysis

Environmental Regulation in Evolution and Governance Strategies

Global Governance and Regulatory States in the Present Phase of Internationalization: Impacts of Product Markets Regulations

Smart mix politics: business actors in the formulation of global supply chain regulation

Left to interest groups? On the prospects for enforcing environmental law in the European Union

Environmental Regulation in a Mixed Economy

Green Technology Development and Adoption: Competition, Regulation, and Uncertainty - A Global Game Approach

Regulatory Uncertainty and Corporate Responses to Environmental Protection in China

THE END OF THE EXTERNALITY REVOLUTION

Cost subsidy or environmental regulation? The effects of government interventions on environmental quality and 3BL performance

Top-down or Bottom-Up? How Environmental State Attention and Civic Participation Coordinate with Green Innovation

Influence of Environmental Regulation on Corporate Green Supply Chain Management: The Regulating Effect of Environmental Dynamism

Environmental policy contests: command and control versus taxes